What do you think of the US Forest Service's view on bigfoot?

[norseman]

8 minutes ago, Silverback Sax said:

We're mostly on the same page.  Though I have a hard time describing them as endangered considering their weakest totally out classes our strongest.  Maybe by human derived statistics, but let's be honest, they seem to do as they please ... where they please, by rules we can't quite comprehend. 

Endangered has nothing to do with physical attributes. 
 

What are their total numbers? Offspring survivability? Range shrinking or growing? Individuals healthy? Aging? 

[Pembo]

12 hours ago, norseman said:

Endangered has nothing to do with physical attributes. 
 

What are their total numbers? Offspring survivability? Range shrinking or growing? Individuals healthy? Aging? 

Agreed. “Endangered” as far as I am aware is based on current, provable, population of any animal. Seeing as no-one has yet managed to ‘prove’ the existence of a single Sasquatch, convincing anyone of a sufficient population that they wouldn’t be considered “endangered” seems an impossibility.