Backdoc Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Government silence: There was an old skit from Saturday Night Live back in the 1970s where President Carter becomes giant from a Pepsi spill on the control panel at a nuclear energy factory. Once President Carter becomes nearly 100Ft tall (from radiation poisoning) reporters ask the government questions. Here is the governments answer: Female Reporter #1: Yes, is it true that the president is 100 feet tall? Ross Denton: Nooooo! Absolutely not! Male reporter #3: Is the president 90 feet tall? Ross Denton: No comment. OK, maybe a non- answer IS an answer after all. :-) 1
Backdoc Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 13 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said: Sasquatch is real. You might be right. Clearly, I am as delusional as the scientific consensus saying otherwise. Bigfoot has not been proven to be real. It has not been proven to be real at a level science in general accepts as a real proven living creature. This doesn't mean you are wrong as Bigfoot exists or doesn't exist on its own merits. Yet, to say Bigdot is proven to be real is just not so. There are those who have that opinion and many have very strong credentials. Keep in mind many who think Bigfoot is a hoax or folklore also have strong credentials. 13 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said: The U.S. Forest Service and other branches of government know it, This is completely impossible to prove. There are those whose view of the GOVERNMENT requires this to be true. They cannot accept bigfoot might be real and yet just an unproven primate. Their own opinion of Bigfoot and their own opinion of the Government REQUIRES the government to 1) know bigfoot exists and 2) does all it can to cover it up. Isn't it just as possible bigfoot is real, near extinct and there just isn't strong enough evidence to convince most of the science community of bigfoot existence? A body would do it. We don't have a body at this time. Let me guess: The Government HAS a body and they have LOTS of Bodies. That is jumping a shark, a Big Shark. I just see a simpler straight forward world existing on this issue. I see this as no different than whatever the Pre-PANDA world was. Whatever the Pre-Duck Billed Platypus world was. Just one man's opinion. I could very well be wrong. My reasoning doesn't require as many successful moving parts
Huntster Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 37 minutes ago, Incorrigible1 said: Well, until your oversize graphic, you weren't posting in all-caps. Yeah, well, I'm hoping that the size and caps illustrate my frustration.
Huntster Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Backdoc said: Quote .........The U.S. Forest Service and other branches of government know it.......... This is completely impossible to prove......... Of course it's not impossible to prove! It is completely possible AFTER discovery. Quote .........There are those whose view of the GOVERNMENT requires this to be true. They cannot accept bigfoot might be real and yet just an unproven primate. Their own opinion of Bigfoot and their own opinion of the Government REQUIRES the government to 1) know bigfoot exists and 2) does all it can to cover it up.......... While your statement might be true, it certainly isn't infallibly so. Simple logic can lead to the opinion that, if sasquatches exist (especially on an Army post for over a century), government must know. One doesn't need to have a negative opinion of government to believe that. Indeed, such an opinion can be seen as very positive of government not being stupidly ignorant. Quote .........Isn't it just as possible bigfoot is real, near extinct and there just isn't strong enough evidence to convince most of the science community of bigfoot existence?........ Of course. indeed, for the Science community, I believe this is the case. But for the U.S. Army, inhabiting Ft. Lewis for over a century...............sorry. If there have been sasquatches running around, somebody there knew about it. Quote .........Let me guess: The Government HAS a body and they have LOTS of Bodies.......... I'm pretty sure they don't...............but am also pretty sure that they did have at least one.
Backdoc Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, Huntster said: Of course. indeed, for the Science community, I believe this is the case. But for the U.S. Army, inhabiting Ft. Lewis for over a century...............sorry. If there have been sasquatches running around, somebody there knew about it. My brother was stationed at Ft Lewis Washington about 20 years ago for many years. He never once heard this rumor in the US Army. It could be. He had basic clearance as a Sargent based on his MOS. Just not something he ever heard even as folklore/ wild rumors. there could be a long history of such reports and rumors in that area. Many thousands have served there over the decades. I can only relate his experience. when I consider what would be required to find, deal with, and keep quiet Sasquatch in the Washington ( or most places) it seems like a bridge too far to keep to quiet. Maybe there is a mechanism I’m not seeing.
Huntster Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Backdoc said: My brother was stationed at Ft Lewis Washington about 20 years ago for many years. He never once heard this rumor in the US Army. It could be. He had basic clearance as a Sargent based on his MOS. Just not something he ever heard even as folklore/ wild rumors. there could be a long history of such reports and rumors in that area. Many thousands have served there over the decades. I can only relate his experience.......... My focus on Ft. Lewis is based primarily on it's regional location. First of all, it's in western Washington, which is clearly a hotspot continentally. Secondly, Ft. Lewis has been there as an Army post since 1917. That takes us back before Albert Ostman, before the Mt. St. Helen's miners, etc. It's definitely pre-modern Sasquatch Media. Thirdly, specific location of Ft. Lewis is absolutely key in that it's at the sountern end of Puget Sound. If animals migrate around the south end of the Sound rather than swim across, they'll walk on Ft. Lewis lands (unless they migrate around through lands more settled by civilians). I also make sure to qualify my position on Ft. Lewis with this: "If sasquatches exist, the Army at Ft. Lewis.........". This is, of course, because sasquatches might not exist. But, personally, I'm pretty confident that they do.............. Quote ..........when I consider what would be required to find, deal with, and keep quiet Sasquatch in the Washington ( or most places) it seems like a bridge too far to keep to quiet. Maybe there is a mechanism I’m not seeing. Well, yeah, they aren't keeping it quiet. Sasquatchery has become huge. They can't keep that quiet. So they simply keep quiet about it officially, which is easy for them to do because they're very experienced at keeping things quiet............or confused. It's what they do with just about everything.
Silverback Sax Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago Y'all sure seem wrapped up in someone else officially recognizing whatever these creatures are. Isn't it enough that millions of our friends, neighbors, and relatives have had some kind of personal experience? I mean, if you believe the government is honest with it's subjects, you may as well believe in sasquatch!
norseman Posted 10 hours ago Admin Posted 10 hours ago 31 minutes ago, Silverback Sax said: Y'all sure seem wrapped up in someone else officially recognizing whatever these creatures are. Isn't it enough that millions of our friends, neighbors, and relatives have had some kind of personal experience? I mean, if you believe the government is honest with it's subjects, you may as well believe in sasquatch! That’s WHY we are wrapped up in it! Bigfoot needs to be OUT of the pixies and gnomes category and into a living species category.👍 Millions of people are “crazy” until that day happens.
Huntster Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 53 minutes ago, Silverback Sax said: Y'all sure seem wrapped up in someone else officially recognizing whatever these creatures are. Isn't it enough that millions of our friends, neighbors, and relatives have had some kind of personal experience? I mean, if you believe the government is honest with it's subjects, you may as well believe in sasquatch! Having had an experience myself, no, I don't need Washington DC to bless my acceptance of sasquatch existence. Moreover, I have a vivid memory of my Dad telling me to forget the world accepting them, because they're better off with the world not knowing, and I couldn't believe he was saying that then................but I finally understand, and agree. But after coming to the conclusion that these creatures are likely a human species, and accepting the certainty that government knows of them, the realization of what that means becomes rather overwhelming. While I still think that Daddy knew best, I'm still considering what another human species out there means for history..........and today.............
Backdoc Posted 10 minutes ago Posted 10 minutes ago (edited) Bigfoot Possibilities to consider (and some I haven't thought up yet) : A) Bigfoot doesn't exist STOP B) Bigfoot doesn't exist but did at one time C) Bigfoot exists but is now extinct with Patty being one of the last few D) Bigfoot exists but is only encountered randomly. The government considers it unproven, so it doesn't care. E) Bigfoot exists and the government suspects it exists but just hasn't caught one yet F) Bigfoot exists and the government not only knows but has proof in the form of a body or live specimen G) Bigfoot exists as a human variant, and the government knows AND the government has active communication/ cooperation with these humans to keep them quiet H) Bigfoot exists and is a human altered by science by our government in some experiment. The government must keep this evil quiet. I) Bigfoot exists, they are aliens, the government is working with the aliens to keep them quiet. Edited 9 minutes ago by Backdoc
Recommended Posts