BC witness Posted August 24 Posted August 24 He has lots of questions, not a lot of answers, but still interesting.
norseman Posted August 25 Admin Author Posted August 25 4 hours ago, BC witness said: He has lots of questions, not a lot of answers, but still interesting. I did not know they had evidence of Homo Erectus or other early man so far north as Siberia.
Incorrigible1 Posted August 25 Posted August 25 I'm a follower of Stefan, but he gives short shrift to the Cerutti mastodon evidence. I appreciate his skeptical nature. I'm not knowledgeable enough to render a decision on the Cerutti mastodon evidence, but lean towards its authenticity. 1 1
norseman Posted August 25 Admin Author Posted August 25 34 minutes ago, Incorrigible1 said: I'm a follower of Stefan, but he gives short shrift to the Cerutti mastodon evidence. I appreciate his skeptical nature. I'm not knowledgeable enough to render a decision on the Cerutti mastodon evidence, but lean towards its authenticity. I concur. Which considering its well over 100,000 years old? It’s a profound find. And most likely not the work of our own species.
BigToe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Yes, I think there were archaic human species that reached the New World, too. Here is possibly an archaic human footprint from Kansas: https://faculty.ucr.edu/~legneref/kansas/kansas.htm Although it could be faked from the similar looking Burtele foot which was discovered the same year as this foot print pictures were uploaded to the website. And here is well documented site of potentially archaic humans in Hueyatlaco, Mexico: 1
Recommended Posts