Sircalum Posted September 3 Author Posted September 3 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Huntster said: Does anybody know when/where this occurred? In the fall of 2013, Todd Standing took Survivorman Les Stroud, Jeff Meldrum PhD professor of Anthropology; and wildlife biologist Dr. John Bindernagel PhD; into the Rocky Mountains and showed them Bigfoot. In March 2014 two episodes of Survivorman Bigfoot aired on 3 networks. Including Discovery channel US. The shows amazing success has spawned a whole new season premiering spring 2015 After three incredible days in the field with the man responsible for the success of Survivorman Bigfoot (Todd Standing) Idaho state University professor Dr. Jeff Meldrum witnesses Todd and his team interacting with a Sasquatch just minutes before witnessing the creature for himself. This entire event is showcased in Bigfoot North. Edited September 3 by Sircalum Correct information quoted
BlackRockBigfoot Posted September 3 Posted September 3 25 minutes ago, Huntster said: Does anybody know when/where this occurred? I believe that this was with Todd Standing in his research area.
BlackRockBigfoot Posted September 3 Posted September 3 1 hour ago, Sircalum said: In the fall of 2013, Todd Standing took Survivorman Les Stroud, Jeff Meldrum PhD professor of Anthropology; and wildlife biologist Dr. John Bindernagel PhD; into the Rocky Mountains and showed them Bigfoot. In March 2014 two episodes of Survivorman Bigfoot aired on 3 networks. Including Discovery channel US. The shows amazing success has spawned a whole new season premiering spring 2015 After three incredible days in the field with the man responsible for the success of Survivorman Bigfoot (Todd Standing) Idaho state University professor Dr. Jeff Meldrum witnesses Todd and his team interacting with a Sasquatch just minutes before witnessing the creature for himself. This entire event is showcased in Bigfoot North. Sorry. I hadn’t refreshed the page to see that you had already responded 1
Sircalum Posted September 4 Author Posted September 4 10 hours ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: Todd Standing =Red Flag. That’s what I’m hearing perhaps the professor was played for a fool? His first sighting might not be genuine? 1
norseman Posted September 6 Admin Posted September 6 Todd Standing's Bigfoot heads are full blown fakes. They even show progression, with later ones being better than the muppet heads in the beginning. But Todd Standing is in a great area along the BC and Alberta border. Did Jeff Meldrum bump something genuine in that area? Who knows. Its my understanding that his sighting was at night with a NV or FLIR scope. I cannot remember which. Its entirely possible that Standing pulled some shenanigans. But its also possible if you believe the creature to be out there that Meldrum may have had a genuine encounter. Either way it doesn't move the goal posts regardless. 1 1
NorCalWitness Posted September 8 Posted September 8 On 9/3/2025 at 6:03 PM, Patterson-Gimlin said: Todd Standing =Red Flag. nope. 1
Patterson-Gimlin Posted September 8 Posted September 8 (edited) 13 hours ago, NorCalWitness said: nope. Yep. Unless of course one is forgiving the many hoaxes. I believe that is called naive. The Muppets is the most laughable. Of course if one takes the subject serious probably best to move on from any and everything Standing. Edited September 8 by Patterson-Gimlin 2 1
NorCalWitness Posted September 8 Posted September 8 (edited) 6 hours ago, Patterson-Gimlin said: Yep. Unless of course one is forgiving the many hoaxes. I believe that is called naive. The Muppets is the most laughable. Of course if one takes the subject serious probably best to move on from any and everything Standing. show the proof or otherwise its just conjecture. this was an interesting watch: Edited September 8 by NorCalWitness 1
Huntster Posted September 8 Posted September 8 1 hour ago, NorCalWitness said: show the proof or otherwise its just conjecture......... Conjecture works well in a world of conjecture. 1
NorCalWitness Posted September 8 Posted September 8 8 minutes ago, Huntster said: Conjecture works well in a world of conjecture. I admit I have not been studying this phenomenon for as long as some. Its been about 8 years of rather focused interest on my part. I have seen the numerous anti-Standing posts, but have yet to see anything that proves him to be a fraud. If there is some sacred knowledge that the more informed have, I would be more than happy to review it.
norseman Posted September 8 Admin Posted September 8 32 minutes ago, NorCalWitness said: I admit I have not been studying this phenomenon for as long as some. Its been about 8 years of rather focused interest on my part. I have seen the numerous anti-Standing posts, but have yet to see anything that proves him to be a fraud. If there is some sacred knowledge that the more informed have, I would be more than happy to review it. There is a heck of alot more to evidence that Standing is a Con man than Paulides??? Paulides is simply reporting on missing persons cases on public lands. And the government cover up. Standing wants the Canadian government to recognize Bigfoot as a real species based on a couple of photos! Errmm… muppets!🤷🏻♂️ This best thing our community can do is ONLY accept physical evidence. But if Paulides is a con man? Standing IS Bernie Madoff! 🤨
Recommended Posts