Bigfoot may have not evolved on Planet Earth.

[georgerm]

24 minutes ago, BigToe said:

Yes.  I was wondering the same about archaic humans or bipedal ape or monkey being the origin of the Big-foot legend.  Here it talks about how there were Bipedal monkeys living in Europe during the time period of archaic humans: 

And there were different types of bipedal apes in Europe as well during the Miocene.  Some of those bipedal apes from Europe are even thought to be related to humans because of some similarities in the fossils to us.  Europe may have been a good place for evolving bipedalism if there were both monkeys and apes evolving bipedalism independently there.

 

I was just reading yesterday of how there were some signs that the Gigantopithecus ape was bipedal:

https://www.cryptoanthropologist.com/2018/06/the-curious-case-of-gigantopithecus.html

 

  However, I think this could perhaps be from fossils of early Homo (i.e. Homo habilis, Homo rufolfensis) misidentified as Gigantopithecus.  This could explain why we don't have any fossils yet of the pre-H. erectus expansion out of Africa.  That is if the primitive H. habilis fossils outside of Africa are misidentified as non-human apes:

https://healthyhumandiversity.weebly.com/blog/are-there-any-super-archaic-human-fossils-misidentified-as-non-human-ape

 

 

Well bigtoe it looks like you have certainly opened a big can of worms. You added enough reading information to keep us all busy for a week so it looks like we're not gonna be able to decide this issue at the present time. The historical record of Bigfoot It is not obvious at the time but some explanations are better than others. The Nephilim explanation answer some of the unusual characteristics of Big Bigfoot where it acts like a supernatural animal rather than a regular earthly animal. I don't know if we're going to be able to identify it from existing archaic and extinct homo species. 

[Frisco85132]

2 hours ago, NathanFooter said:

 

 You need to read more carefully and not assume so much.

 

 Entertaining the possibility is different the driving claims as fact with no evidence, the woo/paranormal group overwhelming do this and present nothing. From the east to the west, every conference puts it on display and is it pathetic. I reject claims that have no evidence.

 

 I clearly defined the types of individuals and the natures of failed capacities and even how they get there. This is all well documented in psychological evaluation in every field imaginable. I shared my findings across the fields of character ( HINT- it does not stop with just bigfoot, the instability is all over their lives and how they interact ) and then overlayed with evidence provided by each category.  So sorry to inform you that on average paranormal claims fall apart under scrutiny and instead show human failure and bias.  Normal sane people don't show me 25 photos of lens flares and dust and call them Sasquatch orbs or tell me they had a hair sample tested and it came back " Bipedal ".   lol.

 

 I made no definitive claim regarding the demonic aspect, I made room as a possibility for a portion of the dataset and then clearly explained that it would be an imposter as the data sources contradict each other on basic levels. I do happen to have a personal belief that a fraction of the claims are true in the sense that something extraordinary is generating some of the events and that the evidence is strong enough to provide it a measure in percentage. My statement is the majority of the woo groups are way out of touch, mentally undisciplined or unable to perceive things accurately and therefore like to report 1147 sick glyphs a year, daily telepathic messages and 150 red circle photos of Sasquatch turning into a tree.  

 

 Out of all the paranormal claims, the claim that Demons exist and have a nature is the least disputed and has loads of evidential volume, so spare me the label. 

 

 The claim that Sasquatches are a paranormal phenomena  provides no convincing information across time and instead fall mostly into a clear bell curve of human fallibility. There is nothing wrong will examining the paranormal aspect but when one world builds on it with heavy significance with zero good information, you become a fool at the least.  It is not even close to contradiction to say that most paranormal stuff is a load of crap generated by dysfunctional people, it is rampant in this subject.

 

 It is not about comfort it is about the measure of evidence so I will continue to stay exactly where I am on this.

 

 

Well said.  In law we call this "Assuming facts not in evidence".

Edited 1 hour ago by Frisco85132
Clarity

[Backdoc]

1 hour ago, Huntster said:

 

Have you ever felt that your Golden Retriever communicated to you?

 

 

I think so...

 

 

[Incorrigible1]

Do bigfoot pilot UFOs?

 

Let's discuss it here, just.....because.

[BigToe]

1 hour ago, georgerm said:

Well bigtoe it looks like you have certainly opened a big can of worms. You added enough reading information to keep us all busy for a week so it looks like we're not gonna be able to decide this issue at the present time. The historical record of Bigfoot It is not obvious at the time but some explanations are better than others. The Nephilim explanation answer some of the unusual characteristics of Big Bigfoot where it acts like a supernatural animal rather than a regular earthly animal. I don't know if we're going to be able to identify it from existing archaic and extinct homo species. 

I am glad you find what I wrote interesting.  I thought the Nephilim were just humans?  I remember reading about them in the Bible as being mighty men.

[Incorrigible1]

5 minutes ago, BigToe said:

I am glad you find what I wrote interesting.  I thought the Nephilim were just humans?  I remember reading about them in the Bible as being mighty men.

 

Sons of fallen angels had intercourse with the daughters of man to produce Nephilim.

The Great Flood was to wipe them out and start over.......