Huntster Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 16 minutes ago, georgerm said: What are you saying? Are you saying the Sasquatch family encounters a human being walking along a trail, and the Sasquatch's capture this person who later escaped. They don't watch the person very well and the human being escapes from captivity. I think this story that you're telling sounds like what happened to a man In the 1800s in British Columbia? You probably heard of a guy by the name of Osterman......... Albert Ostman. It was in the 1920's. Another similar story was Muchalat Harry, also in the 1930's: http://www.bigfootencounters.com/classics/muchalat.htm The third story of kidnapping was not widely known. It was posted by a rural guy from the Copper River Valley of Alaska on an Alaskan outdoorsman forum about an event he was involved with in the 1970's. Here's a link to it: 1
norseman Posted 4 hours ago Admin Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, georgerm said: Don't put yourself down because with enough practice and messing around with new technology we can eventually make progress. I hope the Starlink technology is not too hard to figure out so we all can use it when we need it. I have made a little progress running this place! But I am not Gigantor. Thanks!
norseman Posted 4 hours ago Admin Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, Huntster said: My problem is that I'm a death sentence to everything I bring out there with me. An iridium satellite phone was among the gizmos that were vaporized on my moose hunt last year. No more of it. I need to transcend all that silliness and go like my old buddy Don. Just go out there and disappear in The Land of the Lost. Who knows? Maybe being kidnapped into sexual slavery by a female sasquatch might not be as bad as driving to the bottom of a frozen lake? It’s all fun and games until Mr. Squatch comes home to the cave! 🤣 1
MIB Posted 3 hours ago Moderator Posted 3 hours ago 11 hours ago, Backdoc said: It is easy to imagine elaborate scenarios to explain all things Bigfoot. When Bigfoot is not able to meet its needs, it dies. It will live so long as it can. We don't have to imagine much beyond that .. but we'd be pretty dang foolish not to consider quite a lot beyond that. Your view only works for dumb animals. Insisting on dumb animal behavior for something that is probably Homo something-or-other is pretty darn foolish IMHO. Do we take care of our sick elders or do we feed them and try to protect them? Do we leave them dead on the ground or do we bury them? While they might indeed just be dumb animals, if they are, then we are stupider than we give ourselves credit for because whatever they are, they're consistently outsmarting us. There is no getting around that. MIB 1
norseman Posted 3 hours ago Admin Posted 3 hours ago 27 minutes ago, MIB said: .. but we'd be pretty dang foolish not to consider quite a lot beyond that. Your view only works for dumb animals. Insisting on dumb animal behavior for something that is probably Homo something-or-other is pretty darn foolish IMHO. Do we take care of our sick elders or do we feed them and try to protect them? Do we leave them dead on the ground or do we bury them? While they might indeed just be dumb animals, if they are, then we are stupider than we give ourselves credit for because whatever they are, they're consistently outsmarting us. There is no getting around that. MIB We have been burying our dead for a long time. 👍
Recommended Posts