VAfooter Posted 4 hours ago Admin Posted 4 hours ago Here is the PGF section link: On 3/14/2026 at 10:34 PM, Explorer said: That quote is exactly what Joshua Kitakaze posted on the Facebook page for Coalition for Critical Thinking in Bigfoot thinking. For newer members, Kit was a long time and strongly anti-PGF skeptic on here some time back. His postings can still be found in the PGF section if anyone is interested in his comments. I saw those comments a few days ago when all of this broke. I guess he is still around... On 3/13/2026 at 10:22 AM, Skinwalker13 said: Does anyone know someone that was in attendance? Any ideas how the community is going to react? Welcome back SW! Supposedly, Bill Munns has seen it, but I do not know that to be a fact. I am very interested in his opinion of this. 1
Backdoc Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago If I had a Bigfoot movie with my friends back in my youth (1970's ) any bigfoot would look like footage from the PGF in the following sense: -Any footage would have a Bigfoot subject. -The camera would come on to the subject. -Unless the video was designed to have bigfoot attack the cameraman, the Bigfoot would walk away or run away. -The setting would be in some sort of outdoors, probably wooded area. That generic happening would be common in nearly any bigfoot video. It wouldn't make it "Trial Run" or anything else. This reminds me of the Roger Patterson drawing appearing in Roger's book PRIOR TO the PGF event. It didn't signal a pre-PGF tell, it was just a drawing inspired largely from other reports.
jameskrav Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) I posted on another thread about this that Bill Munns opines that the new found footage was Al trying to convince himself that Roger's PGF was not itself a hoax (since Al was going to take it on tour and was worried he'd be at risk of fraud). My head was spinning at that explanation. If the new footage has the 'subject' doing Patty things (lifing it's foot to 90 degrees, etc), has breasts , and has a similar head (the most important), then it's pretty much done. Why Roger would wait a year (being constantly poor) to film the cash cow makes no sense to me however. That the film was in the possession of someone who worked at Boeing (they had a film lab) may finally explain how the PGF was developed so covertly. Edited 2 hours ago by jameskrav
Incorrigible1 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago A great deal of rumors, innuendo, and supposition being put forth about what people "hear, imagine, and think" what's revealed in the "new" documentary. Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary? Buehler, Buehler?
VAfooter Posted 1 hour ago Admin Posted 1 hour ago On 3/17/2026 at 2:15 PM, norseman said: I am not a huge fan of Money maker. But I think he is right, it comes down to the suit. Same here. I could not read the entire thing since I do not do FB, but what I did read was on target in my opinion. 1 hour ago, Incorrigible1 said: Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary? Unless they were at SXSW, I doubt it. Guessing at some point in the not too distant future, it will start appearing on streaming services.
Recommended Posts