New Film Shown at South by South West "Capturing Bigfoot"

[Huntster]

11 hours ago, Backdoc said:

..........Some skeptics are hoping it is a smoking gun............

 

I'm confident it is and that those skeptics have another hole in their feet.

[Backdoc]

45 minutes ago, Huntster said:

 

I'm confident it is and that those skeptics have another hole in their feet.

 

 

 

 

The PGF could be a hoax.  I could accept that conclusion if I had enough proof.

 

I can imagine someone might do a trail run of a hoax.   They might film it and take a look at the results to make sure it is convincing or make corrective actions if it not.  Then later after such a tweaking they either film the hoax or film a few more attempts at prepping until they get it right.  Maybe they have one rehearsal.  Maybe they have 4 or 5.   Some or all might be filmed.   If filmed, the films would have to be developed somewhere.   

 

If I have followed this saga correctly, we are to think the trial run(s) was developed at Boeing aircraft.   <--- This makes little sense.  If we can come up with a reason why this might make sense, we still have to explain why it seems Boeing had no way to develop this.   <--- That is too much of a deal breaker to the buzz of this new film story.  If it could be shown Boeing could develop the film (and I doubt it) it somewhat helps Roger's cause by providing him help on the controversial PGF development timeline. 

 

Now there could be a trial run but they got the development part of the story wrong.  That is, you could have a film where Roger and Al made a pre-PGF hoax attempt(s), but it was developed somewhere other than Boeing.  Those with the Trail Run film assumed it was developed and Boeing. 

 

The PGF may be real or a hoax as far as I am concerned.  Yet, I seriously doubt 1) any film was able to be developed at Boeing.  2) The hoaxers would be so incompetent to film their effort to commit some fraud/ hoax and leave the major smoking gun evidence around to be discovered.  They would destroy any film like that.  They certainly are not going to film themselves planning on committing the crime and then suddenly forget to get rid of the evidence.  

 

I will await the see this film for myself to reserve any final judgment, but I want to see the entire work product- not some edited portions offered.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Huntster]

8 hours ago, Backdoc said:

The PGF could be a hoax.  I could accept that conclusion if I had enough proof............

 

(I did not downvote you.........)

 

We're over half a century into this game. The Full Monte. We've seen how desperately some want to make it a hoax (although I cannot understand the desperation). That written, after all this time, analysis, and opinion, I've come to the conclusion. that the film is of a sasquatch. Of course, that's an "opinion" or a "belief", so has no scientific credibility..........but, then, I've gone on the record for years now here and elsewhere with my "opinion" that Science has lost much of its credibility................and that isn't just this silly issue. It now runs a large gamut.

 

Quote

..........I can imagine someone might do a trail run of a hoax. 

 

There was no secret about the fact that Patterson was trying to create a Bigfoot documentary, of which today we have way, way, way, way too many available to watch. All a devoted skeptic has to do is to transform his silly documentary into a "trial run".

 

Sorry. I'm pretty cynical about just about everything now. I really need to die and move on. I don't belong on this planet.