Sircalum Posted Sunday at 04:37 AM Posted Sunday at 04:37 AM (edited) Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot! Edited Sunday at 04:39 AM by Sircalum
RedHawk454 Posted Sunday at 04:59 AM Posted Sunday at 04:59 AM 21 minutes ago, Sircalum said: Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot! so is this supposed to be pro PGF or pro capturing sasquatch?
Bonehead74 Posted Sunday at 05:32 AM Posted Sunday at 05:32 AM 54 minutes ago, Sircalum said: Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot! Source?
Incorrigible1 Posted Sunday at 06:04 AM Posted Sunday at 06:04 AM 1 hour ago, Sircalum said: Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot! Blobsquatch!
Bonehead74 Posted Sunday at 06:47 AM Posted Sunday at 06:47 AM I sent a link to Sircalum's picture to Eric/Hairy Man Road, asking him to confirm that it is a still from the new documentary footage in question. Hopefully I get a reply soon 🤞🤞
Sircalum Posted Sunday at 11:09 AM Posted Sunday at 11:09 AM 5 hours ago, Bonehead74 said: Source? It’s from the trailer
Huntster Posted Sunday at 01:32 PM Posted Sunday at 01:32 PM 7 hours ago, Incorrigible1 said: Blobsquatch! Looks to me like a Dfoot re-run.
FrankNBeauty Posted Sunday at 02:49 PM Posted Sunday at 02:49 PM 10 hours ago, Sircalum said: Here is the documentary pre-Patty Bigfoot! Is that not just after frame 352? That is the exact rock/stick formations from Bluff Creek, the 66 footage isn’t in Bluff Creek from what I’ve read. Just looks like a filter over the Patterson footage.
OntarioSquatch Posted Sunday at 04:59 PM Posted Sunday at 04:59 PM (edited) That’s a frame from the 1967 film. It comes after frame 352. Edited Sunday at 05:02 PM by OntarioSquatch 1
RedHawk454 Posted Sunday at 06:31 PM Posted Sunday at 06:31 PM Yeah, I’m still confused how the image above is supposed to disprove the PGF? 1
Sircalum Posted Sunday at 07:00 PM Posted Sunday at 07:00 PM 26 minutes ago, RedHawk454 said: Yeah, I’m still confused how the image above is supposed to disprove the PGF? Yes people were saying that picture in the trailer was from the mystery 1966 film. It was not it’s a frame from the PGF with filters applied to it.
RedHawk454 Posted Sunday at 07:03 PM Posted Sunday at 07:03 PM So who was in the suit? Bob heroinimois or Deatley?
RedHawk454 Posted Sunday at 07:09 PM Posted Sunday at 07:09 PM (edited) Just answered my own question. The claims are that DeAtley was in the 40 second rehearsal and Bob H was in the actual 1967 PGF. I’m just trying to follow the claims. Edited Sunday at 07:09 PM by RedHawk454
Sircalum Posted Sunday at 07:11 PM Posted Sunday at 07:11 PM 3 minutes ago, RedHawk454 said: So who was in the suit? Bob heroinimois or Deatley? Was it a suit? What did Gimlin say? Was it a full confession? That’s the only thing that would seal Patty’s fate in my mind I don’t trust the mystery film it could have been made after Patty and the date is just the freshness date when it was manufactured?
RedHawk454 Posted Sunday at 07:13 PM Posted Sunday at 07:13 PM (edited) I am a believer in Sasquatch but I can’t outright say that the PGF isn’t some fat dude in a latex, skin tight suit with ape looking hair on it. If anything suit in the late 60’s could be superior than today’s stuff since people actual did a quality job back then With that said, Pattys right pectoral muscle twitch, flex, and movement as she turned to look at the camera looks genuine muscle fiber moving and on a large relic hominid creature and not something faked. You see bodybuilders make those pec flexes especially in side chest poses. I can do it to. Edited Sunday at 07:17 PM by RedHawk454
Recommended Posts