Capturing Bigfoot

[Sircalum]

2 minutes ago, OntarioSquatch said:

Meldrum was just repeating Joe’s line where he explores what he thinks is a possibility.
 

The only arguments presented here by skeptics are that people close to Patterson claim it’s a hoax. Meanwhile Patty herself has characteristics that aren’t repeatable with costumes.

 

 

There’s also an unseen early film from the same location with the first trial costume?

[norseman]

56 minutes ago, Sircalum said:

There’s also an unseen early film from the same location with the first trial costume?

I’ve seen Heronimous in a costume….. I won’t hold my breath.

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Sircalum said:

Don’t kill the messenger it was Roger’s son Clint and Patricia Patterson. Clint explained the entire thing the only hope is that it was fake AI but I don’t see anyone questioning that on the News report in the link I posted above. Tune in Thursday after we watch it to go over the content.

I am not killing the messenger.
 

You were cherry picking some “gotcha moment” Rogan video short against Meldrum. Which is a crock. It doesn’t even remotely represent what Meldrum said in the full interview let alone years of conferences and his BOOK!? Really? Have you read it?

 

So hence forth I will be scrutinizing you based on this slanderous event you perpetrated on this forum. Sorry. 

[Incorrigible1]

6 minutes ago, norseman said:

I am not killing the messenger.
 

You were cherry picking some “gotcha moment” Rogan video short against Meldrum. Which is a crock. It doesn’t even remotely represent what Meldrum said in the full interview let alone years of conferences and his BOOK!? Really? Have you read it?

 

So hence forth I will be scrutinizing you based on this slanderous event you perpetrated on this forum. Sorry. 

 

Such surely brings into question any conclusions our new member draws.

[OntarioSquatch]

It’s 2026 and people are still desperately trying to discredit the film. So far all attempts have failed as none of them address the issues that exist with replicating the film subject with 1960’s costume technology.

[Explorer]

 

[norseman]

2 minutes ago, OntarioSquatch said:

It’s 2026 and people are still desperately trying to discredit the film. So far all attempts have failed as none of them address the issues that exist with replicating the film subject with 1960’s costume technology.

For me personally? Its authenticity has no bearing on things I have seen in the woods. And I am very sure that is true of others as well.

 

And it also has no bearing going forward on proof of a new species. That requires a body.

 

I will listen to new evidence. But as you say, everything thus far has been abysmal.

[Sircalum]

41 minutes ago, norseman said:

I will listen to new evidence. But as you say, everything thus far has been abysmal.

https://people.com/famous-1967-bigfoot-film-was-staged-says-director-of-new-doc-11926085
It’s damning if you read the breakdown here that said I haven’t seen it myself yet.

[Incorrigible1]

53 minutes ago, Explorer said:

 

 

Mentions methods that could conceivably add perceived muscle movement to suits, yet fails to demonstrate any such effects on the various suits that have been put forth, over the years. None of those proposed suits have even approached the biological movements seen in the PGF.

 

I predict the Capturing Bigfoot expose will be less than satisfying.