norseman Posted 13 hours ago Admin Posted 13 hours ago I always thought the skull shape was similar to Patty. If its a fake?👏
xspider1 Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I don't see the 'perfect fit' with a human skeleton that thunker sees. And, I don't 'finally know that this is some dude or a gal in a monkey suit' based on that analysis. Is Bigfoot highly intelligent? Do we know that it wouldn't run across a clearing? Too many people are trying to speculate what Bigfeet are, what they are not and what they would or would not ever do, imo.
Backdoc Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Let me start by saying flat out I never felt this MD Footage was real and always thought it was a hoax. I do have to defend it on TT's analysis: TT's blow-up-skeleton analysis is trying to squeeze too much out of the blurry, ill-defind image. It is asking too much out of the availible image. If the image was pretty well defined then any overlay might be OK. I agree with TT's comments how the figure just happens to run by an open field on a busy holiday full of people. This is not expected for a reclusive, smart animal. Yet, sometimes that is exactly what happens in real life. A good consideration but that is not absolute. People have nature sightings and often have them because the animal in question does come out into the open usually moving into hiding shortly after. I remember seeing this on Discovery/ They correctly asked Q about the very end of the run where it seems the figure lifted a mask off its head. Maybe or maybe not. That makes more sense then having to squeeze out reasons like the idea of the Bigfoot lifting a child bigfoot off the back. TT's deserves credit for trying but it doesn't seem like it is a fair test. Edited 2 hours ago by Backdoc
norseman Posted 1 hour ago Admin Posted 1 hour ago I see the same head shape. The creature up in Washington does appear smaller. Peaked head and heavy brow ridge.
TD-40 Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago I agree with what has been said about this blurry image and how it does not work well with this sort of analysis. I like PDNA analysis that TT developed but it does not work with this blurry of an image. So we have a subject that ran faster than a Univ. of Washington college athlete across a mountainside with great stride and great acuity, while wearing a big suit (not available at Walmart). And was running high up where nobody would get a good view of it even if they happened to see it. I want to know who these hoaxers are. I conclude that the MD footage was not a hoax.
Recommended Posts