Best Circumstantial Evidence

[Backdoc]

On 8/7/2026 at 11:25 AM, norseman said:

Yes. But no elk hoof tracks in the cast area.  
 

So did it levitate out of its bed?

 

. 

 

 

 

Were there obvious Bigfoot footprints in the area?  How did bigfoot get there?  slide or crawl for instance.   I might be blinded by my expectations but I would expect Bigfoot footprints provided there is soil which allowed other footprints 

[norseman]

2 hours ago, Backdoc said:

 

Were there obvious Bigfoot footprints in the area?  How did bigfoot get there?  slide or crawl for instance.   I might be blinded by my expectations but I would expect Bigfoot footprints provided there is soil which allowed other footprints 

It was theorized it crawled. It’s just much harder for soft soled critters to be tracked. I have been on Bear trails that were completely matted down. But not any individual bear tracks that could be observed.

 

And then there is the whole intelligence thing. If Homo Naledi was burying its dead? And Homo Erectus was tracking an animal to exhaustion? Surely Sasquatch understands it’s leaving tracks. The ones we find either cannot be helped or it didn’t care if we found them. Not saying Sasquatch is inventing the longer lasting light bulb. But it’s gonna be on a whole other level than say a Bear. And Bears crawl and roll around as well. Just because they can. Not because they are not wanting to leave tracks.

 

But Elk are gonna leave hoof tracks when they stand up out of a bedded position. Just a much smaller foot print per animal size and very hard. Which makes them and all ungulates much easier to track. IMHO.

[xspider1]

On 8/8/2026 at 12:03 AM, guyzonthropus said:

.... I'd think most mutations that would cause drastic morphological changes will prove lethal from the get go or shortly there after, unless, of course its the result of direct genetic manipulation recombining the genes of disparate species in a plotted out effort, but even then the original species involved could be identified. Were it by just a single inheritable trait that sasquatch is set apart from modern humans then it might well be attributed to an aberrant mutation, but there's clearly more involved in the differentiation between us.

 

Well said and, I think I understand (at least that last sentence).  % )   There is a 'School of Thought' that proposes the idea that human beings came into existence as a result of genetic altering.  Without going too far into the woo aspects; that might explain our meteoric rise to world domination..  And, perhaps, Bigfoot are the result of deliberate genetic altering as well.  I know that gets away from the OP a bit but, it does circle back to circumstantial evidence.  Apparently, by definition, all of the evidence of Bigfoot (any everything else, really) is circumstantial, (exempting eyewitnesses, of course) until proven by Science. 

 

So, to me, the circumstantial evidence for Bigfoot points directly to their undeniable existence and, therefore, to the undeniable conclusion that we are missing, or deliberately avoiding, 1 or more pieces of the puzzle.

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by xspider1

[norseman]

25 minutes ago, xspider1 said:

 

Well said and, I think I understand (at least that last sentence).  % )   There is a 'School of Thought' that proposes the idea that human beings came into existence as a result of genetic altering.  Without going too far into the woo aspects; that might explain our meteoric rise to world domination..  And, perhaps, Bigfoot are the result of deliberate genetic altering as well.  I know that gets away from the OP a bit but, it does circle back to circumstantial evidence.  Apparently, by definition, all of the evidence of Bigfoot (any everything else, really) is circumstantial, (exempting eyewitnesses, of course) until proven by Science. 

 

So, to me, the circumstantial evidence for Bigfoot points directly to their undeniable existence and, therefore, to the undeniable conclusion that we are missing, or deliberately avoiding, 1 or more pieces of the puzzle.

 

 

At least 21 species of Homo, not counting all of our bipedal cousins that didn’t make the cut. 
 

If something was altering our genetics? We are not a one off knockoff. Probably more like 50 prototypes before us if we start the stop watch at bipedalism. If we count lesser Apes or Monkeys as well?
 

Thousands.