Best Circumstantial Evidence

[norseman]

9 hours ago, Trogluddite said:

^^^ Date of occurrence, to the degree of detail actually reported.  Not all websites post date of reporting.  A lot of reports from the 50s, 60s, and 70s are reported years or decades after the claimed encounter. 

 

For the 2000s, 36% were reported within 30 days of the claimed encounter.  After 30 days, but within one year, 18%; after one year, 41%.  4% of the reports didn't provide enough information to draw a conclusion.

 

Overall for 1340 reports, the numbers are 32% (w/in 30 days); 16% (> 30 days to 1 year); 46% (> 1 year); 4% (unknown).

Thanks! So almost half didn’t actually occur the same year as it was reported. Interesting.

[Northern Lights]

1 hour ago, norseman said:

Thanks! So almost half didn’t actually occur the same year as it was reported. Interesting.

 

I was visiting my cousin (who grew up and currently lives on the northern coast of Oregon) 2 years ago and she revealed to me that she had a sighting in her backyard in the 80's.  She has known of my interest in squatching for the last 15 years, but never said a thing.  She finally opened up and told everyone after 40 years.