Bigfoot myth or monster?

[xspider1]

35 minutes ago, norseman said:

Not when it comes to military tech watching 1000s of miles of borders and coast lines. It absolutely does not explain it.

 

They know it’s there. They have to know it’s there. But they don’t want us to know it’s there.

 

Did Scientific classification of the Mountain Gorilla, finally, in 1902 cause World panic?  Did millions of World Government employees conspire effectively to keep Mountain Gorillas a secret since the beginning of recorded history, up until 1902?  Of course not.  They were just an extraordinary discovery that required definitive proof before most people who had never seen one would 'believe'.  As Backdoc has indicated (several times I think) there is no massive, coordinated conspiracy required for Bigfoot to exist and not yet be classified. 

 

"A very large alpha predator that is intelligent living in remote dense mountainous terrain poses a significant threat."  How do you know they are an Alpha predator?  How do you know they are intelligent?  How do you know they are a threat?   just wondering  

 

I am more scared of Black Widow spiders than Bigfoot although, they are very non-aggressive and I hope I never need to kill one.  Unless there is no other viable option, Bigfoot, Black Widows and many other creatures are just too magnificent to kill, in my opinion.  

Edited 34 minutes ago by xspider1

[xspider1]

35 minutes ago, norseman said:

No. Bigfoot would fall into either the extant or extinct category.

 

Until they fall into one category or the other, they don't fall into either.  And, if they are never classified, they will never fall into either category.  So, I think you are putting the cart before the horse.  I read your post (and certainly not trying to call you out, especially since you graciously run the show here and participate intelligently, probably more than anyone else.)  But, I still have not seen any indication that a full skeleton of both a male and a female Bigfoot would be required by Science.