Bigfoot myth or monster?

[xspider1]

35 minutes ago, norseman said:

Not when it comes to military tech watching 1000s of miles of borders and coast lines. It absolutely does not explain it.

 

They know it’s there. They have to know it’s there. But they don’t want us to know it’s there.

 

Did Scientific classification of the Mountain Gorilla, finally, in 1902 cause World panic?  Did millions of World Government employees conspire effectively to keep Mountain Gorillas a secret since the beginning of recorded history, up until 1902?  Of course not.  They were just an extraordinary discovery that required definitive proof before most people who had never seen one would 'believe'.  As Backdoc has indicated (several times I think) there is no massive, coordinated conspiracy required for Bigfoot to exist and not yet be classified. 

 

"A very large alpha predator that is intelligent living in remote dense mountainous terrain poses a significant threat."  How do you know they are an Alpha predator?  How do you know they are intelligent?  How do you know they are a threat?   just wondering  

 

I am more scared of Black Widow spiders than Bigfoot although, they are very non-aggressive and I hope I never need to kill one.  Unless there is no other viable option, Bigfoot, Black Widows and many other creatures are just too magnificent to kill, in my opinion.  

Edited 10 hours ago by xspider1

[xspider1]

35 minutes ago, norseman said:

No. Bigfoot would fall into either the extant or extinct category.

 

Until they fall into one category or the other, they don't fall into either.  And, if they are never classified, they will never fall into either category.  So, I think you are putting the cart before the horse.  I read your post (and certainly not trying to call you out, especially since you graciously run the show here and participate intelligently, probably more than anyone else.)  But, I still have not seen any indication that a full skeleton of both a male and a female Bigfoot would be required by Science.

[Huntster]

23 hours ago, norseman said:

.........The military is using scientists too. But they are not allowed to publish findings to peer reviewed publications.

Part of science is now dark. And has been since the bomb.........

 

This. The federal government have agencies full of scientists, and their work and publications are government property. It may or may not be published. So if it isn't published, is it still Science? Is it still truth?

 

Quote

.........if your work happens to pertain with above top secret research? We know who the real boss is...........

 

We've been told that even the POTUS has been kept in the dark over many issues over the "need to know" doctrine. But if the POTUS learns that aliens exist, and he/she announces it, does it make it so? If not, why not? Who then looks into the POTUS's claim and verifies it? 

 

Somebody has to be the final voice of discovery. Who is that, and how did he/she get that power?

 

Quote

.........Dr. Gary Nolan has stated they are building a retrieval team to beat the military out to these crash sites. All I can say is? Good Luck! 👀

 

You and I both agree something funky is going on with Bigfoot as well. Someone doesn’t want them discovered for what ever the reason.

 

Beating Uncle Sam to an alien crash site is pretty much beyond the capability of Joe Sixpack, but beating authorities of all levels to a fresh sasquatch habitation area? Very, very possible...........

[Huntster]

10 hours ago, xspider1 said:

Did Scientific classification of the Mountain Gorilla, finally, in 1902 cause World panic?...........

 

No, but the original "discovery" of lowland gorillas (a process during the years 1847-1859) came (part and parcel) with a world ideology/struggle that continues to this day: Darwinism.