norseman Posted 9 hours ago Admin Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Huntster said: Of course you should! Right now as I eat my morning granola and type on this laptop I'm watching Nathan (a former, and perhaps still present poster here) on his Study Sasquach channel. He just casted yet another footprint. Now, I'm not so impressed with yet another sasquatch footprint cast. There must be thousands of them now in various collections, including the PGF casts that came with a film of the creature actually making the footprints. They "prove" nothing. What I'm interested with in Nathan's videos are: 1) He's honest, no BS, and is as down to Earth as they get 2) He's active and tenacious, and I can always expect him to provide an excellent video of his experiences 3) And he uses incredibly wonderful gear, which is a science in and of itself, and even at my age, I'm still interested in such stuff for hunting (which my tyrannical wife and decreasing health seems to increasingly prevent me from enjoying) I have been in the woods with Nathan in north Idaho. He is a very respectful, knowledgeable young man.👍 1
norseman Posted 9 hours ago Admin Posted 9 hours ago 2 hours ago, xspider1 said: So, you have proof that Bigfoot run down prey and break their necks? I guess I should be watching more youtube videos. If Bigfoot are such an aggressive threat to humans then it seems like we would have a body already. Instead, they seem to avoid us like the plague. I was not talking about classifying magnificent animals, I was talking about the notion that the only way to classify one was to kill a male and a female. You can bet all you want, but you don't know me. There are many far more dangerous places than Ape Canyon, WA. We have evidence. Yes. John Mioncynski talks about Elk with broken necks. The Bauman story the trapper had a broken neck. The Nahanni headless valley. The Indian stories of Sasquatch being a giant cannibal. The Yeti is known as a Yak killer as well. How is a 800 lbs primate gonna feed itself in snowy mountains six months out of the year?🤷🏻♂️ DO THE MATH. ITS NOT A NOTION. Its called science. Its been happening for 100s of years. And don't shoot the messenger! I didn't write the rules. I hunt in Grizzly country and I cannot fathom a more terrifying scenario than having my cabin bombarded by giant rocks from a group of giants that are working in a organized attack. Animals don't do that. They don't throw projectiles and they don't conduct warfare on a human scale. Evidently Sasquatch do. That is terrifying. Port Chatham AK? Same story. If you want to be more terrified of spiders in your attic and think of Sasquatch as a gentle giant? Thats your prerogative to do so.
norseman Posted 3 hours ago Admin Posted 3 hours ago 7 hours ago, Backdoc said: This is a very good point. We assume the 1,000 of miles of border are so secured they could see easily anything from a lost dog to bigfoot (and clearly identify it). Is that assumption correct? Assuming that is the case, it's a strong point. Are all areas of the northern border protected equally? I don't know how good the tech is and if that tech is universally that good along the entire border. Could good tech still so limited it looks like a blob on a scan resembling a hunter in the woods? I don't know Are there enough eyes to see? How good are those eyes? Finally, if Bigfoot is near extinct there are few encounter opportunities. Patty probably lived her entire life in Bluff Creek and the surrounding area. Unless she felt the need to travel, she may have never traveled more than X miles from home here entire life. If so, that might be she never was near the Canadian border. Granted that only might account for one specimin- Patty. Security cam from a store robbery: Cheap cell phone: Could be. For an event to be covered up the event first has to occur in the first place. Then, assuming it does, there has to be a motivation for those coving up to cover up. I can dream up scenarios for or against this idea. I will keep an open mind for now. If the Washington DOT has caught it on FLIR cameras? The Feds have certainly caught it on all their surveillance.
xspider1 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, norseman said: We have evidence. Yes. John Mioncynski talks about Elk with broken necks. The Bauman story the trapper had a broken neck. The Nahanni headless valley. The Indian stories of Sasquatch being a giant cannibal. The Yeti is known as a Yak killer as well. How is a 800 lbs primate gonna feed itself in snowy mountains six months out of the year?🤷🏻♂️ DO THE MATH. ITS NOT A NOTION. Its called science. Its been happening for 100s of years. And don't shoot the messenger! I didn't write the rules. I hunt in Grizzly country and I cannot fathom a more terrifying scenario than having my cabin bombarded by giant rocks from a group of giants that are working in a organized attack. Animals don't do that. They don't throw projectiles and they don't conduct warfare on a human scale. Evidently Sasquatch do. That is terrifying. Port Chatham AK? Same story. If you want to be more terrified of spiders in your attic and think of Sasquatch as a gentle giant? Thats your prerogative to do so. Villainizing Sasquatch promotes and attempts to justify the idea that killing a Male and a Female is the best way to prove them to Science. As I'm sure you know, there are many dangerous animals and many laws against poaching. I'm not terrified of Spiders as you say, I actually admire and study them. I am just cautious and respective of many animals, those that kill humans and those that don't. I don't know what they eat and neither do you. And, in Ape Canyon, I'm assuming that you would be armed to the hilt and preferably not alone (I would be.) There are actually numerous animals and plants that 'throw' projectiles. Do the math yourself. You are generalizing the term 'Science' a bit randomly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectile_use_by_non-human_organisms
norseman Posted 17 minutes ago Admin Posted 17 minutes ago 52 minutes ago, xspider1 said: Villainizing Sasquatch promotes and attempts to justify the idea that killing a Male and a Female is the best way to prove them to Science. As I'm sure you know, there are many dangerous animals and many laws against poaching. I'm not terrified of Spiders as you say, I actually admire and study them. I am just cautious and respective of many animals, those that kill humans and those that don't. I don't know what they eat and neither do you. And, in Ape Canyon, I'm assuming that you would be armed to the hilt and preferably not alone (I would be.) There are actually numerous animals and plants that 'throw' projectiles. Do the math yourself. You are generalizing the term 'Science' a bit randomly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projectile_use_by_non-human_organisms How have I villainized Sasquatch? Pushing morality onto animals is silly IMHO. How am I attempting to justify an idea? Science isn’t an idea. I am simply telling you how it works. Go talk to the Smithsonian about type specimens! https://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/ How am I telling you that 2 type specimens is the best way to prove them to science? Again…. Type specimens ARE taken in the scientific classification process. Full stop! You said you were scared of black widows, not me. I never introduced spiders into this conversation. You did.🤷♂️ As a boy I used to collect spiders in jars. I liked the jumping ones the best. I do know what they eat. Because the land dictates what they can and cannot eat. Plus there are mounds of anecdotal evidence that they hunt and eat meat. Plants do not grow in winter in the Rocky Mountains. And primates don’t hibernate like Bears. Hence Bigfoot while an omnivore will absolutely kill and eat meat if given the chance. A 800 lbs body is expensive. Especially during winter. Yes. Now show me a group of animals that take revenge hours later on a human cabin by throwing giant stones in a coordinated attack? And there are plenty of other accounts of rocks being thrown at people. We are obviously not dealing with just another animal here.
Recommended Posts