Huntster Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 hours ago, Backdoc said: .........I still say bigfoot would be essentially an ape........... Homo sapiens are also apes, although if you call somebody an "ape", they will almost certainly be offended.
georgerm Posted 18 minutes ago Author Posted 18 minutes ago 9 hours ago, Huntster said: The feral homo sapien also explains why DNA analysis comes back as "human". But, then, a human relative and/or hybrid might also do that. I don't believe that feral Homo sapiens fully explain the phenomenon, but I do claim that it almost certainly explains some reports and is part of the overall explanation. The Zana story clearly "proves" that "scientifically". Humans evolved from other hominins in Africa several million years ago. Although some scientists equate humans with all members of the genus Homo, in common usage it generally refers to Homo sapiens, the only extant member. Homo sapiens emerged around 300,000 years ago and migrated out of Africa, gradually replacing local populations of archaic humans. Early humans were hunter-gatherers, before the invention of agriculture and domestication of animals led to permanent settlement in the Fertile Crescent and other cradles of civilization. We Homo sapiens emerged 300,000 years ago and we replaced archaic humans. I suppose the Neanderthals are the archaic humans and bigfoot is probably some kind of advanced primate and not human. Bigfoot is short of being an archaic human but seems to be highly intelligent for avoiding capture for this long? Does bigfoot have a spoken language?
Recommended Posts