georgerm Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago On 10/14/2026 at 6:59 AM, NCBFr said: Based on my reading of hundreds if not 1000+ reports, I am a firm believer that the Federal Government as a whole fully understands BF and for reasons you can only guess feels it is best not to reveal them and even protect them where possible. For instance, what are the legal or even constitutional issues if they are some form of relic hominem? Even worse, what if they have an alien origin (which I do not believe but there are plenty of BF/UFO related reports). I have seen them and ran in to them multiple times over the last 30 years in NC and NJ (and may have a den/hunting blind build by them 100 yards from my back yard) and no longer care to get proof of their existence. I doubt I would reach for my camera or phone if one posed for me. Just leave them alone like they leave me alone when wandering through the woods. Quote Based on my reading of hundreds if not 1000+ reports, I am a firm believer that the Federal Government as a whole fully understands BF and for reasons you can only guess feels it is best not to reveal them and even protect them where possible. For instance, what are the legal or even constitutional issues if they are some form of relic hominem? Thanks for the reply NCBFr. Yes, the Forest Service and the BLM fully understands BF or partially understands since they have thousands of employees who travel the back roads of dense forest and many have witnessed bigfoot. These employees have reported their sightings to their bosses. The reports eventually reach the top echelons where they say nothing except bigfoot is a mythical creature, and it you keep talking about, it you will be fired. They know public knowledge of bigfoot could shut down logging in vast areas of America so they don't spend a dime on bigfoot studies and verification.
georgerm Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 10 hours ago, xspider1 said: Those are good questions, georgerm! I have quit jobs for ethical reasons so, I kind of get it. Life is too short to live a lie, forever. I am of the opinion that Government(s) are not capable of keeping secrets for very long, which is a good thing. The truth eventually becomes obvious to everyone except hard-core denialists. I believe that many witnesses to the paranormal just see no real benefit in trying to convince others. They probably only tell their experiences to people they trust and perhaps (like me), they don't give a rat's ass about those who only ridicule. Sometimes, it seems perfectly reasonable to let simpletons bask in blissful ignorance. Quote I am of the opinion that Government(s) are not capable of keeping secrets for very long, which is a good thing. The truth eventually becomes obvious to everyone except hard-core denialists. In order to gain a bigfoot secret, the government has to study the creature which they won't do because public secrets or proof of bigfoot could help shut down logging. Remember how public studies of the Spotted Owl helped environmentalist shut down logging in a few public forests? "The northern spotted owl has been a focal point of environmental and economic conflict in Oregon for more than three decades. Listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in 1990, it depends on mature and old‑growth forests, making timber harvest practices a central point of contention.", internet Edited 1 hour ago by georgerm
georgerm Posted 54 minutes ago Author Posted 54 minutes ago 49 minutes ago, georgerm said: In order to gain a bigfoot secret, the government has to study the creature which they won't do because public secrets or proof of bigfoot could help shut down logging. Remember how public studies of the Spotted Owl helped environmentalist shut down logging in a few public forests? "The northern spotted owl has been a focal point of environmental and economic conflict in Oregon for more than three decades. Listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act in 1990, it depends on mature and old‑growth forests, making timber harvest practices a central point of contention.", internet Call this site below up on youtube to learn more about the Spotted Owl. oregon's spotted owl helped give rise to the endangered species act. 50 years later, has it worked
georgerm Posted 52 minutes ago Author Posted 52 minutes ago oregon's spotted owl helped give rise to the endangered species act. 50 years later, has it worked
norseman Posted 8 minutes ago Admin Posted 8 minutes ago 22 hours ago, MIB said: The federal government is not a homogeneous entity, it is a complex system with distinct parts in groups and tiers. I do not think there is a single means to stop 2.4 to 3 million federal employees, plus 1.3 million active duty military people, plus 3.5 million (plus) private contractors ultimately paid by the US government from talking to someone if there was a secret. That is only people currently in federal employment of some sort, doesn't include those who used to work for the US gov't in some capacity who would also know if the federal government as a whole fully understands bigfoot. So, with as much respect as possible given that I'm ridiculing your conclusion ... I find your "belief" functionally preposterous simply because a conspiracy of silence involving up to 8 million current people and several 10s of millions including living past employees is absolutely unworkable. I hope when you look at it in those terms, you also understand how preposterous it is. If we break it down a bit and just look at how many current federal employees, direct and indirect, work in areas overlapping historical bigfoot reports who would have to be silenced, it's still a number in the tens of thousands. It is not only that their awareness that bigfoot exists that has to be suppressed, but that they have been threatened with something if they do not maintain that secrecy. If you think that is possible you do not understand how absolutely stubborn people get when coercion is attempted. I don't know what I would do, not with absolute certainty. I might decide not to take a picture, I might decide to do so for personal reasons (counting coup?) only, or I might decide to to share ... it is hard to say for sure until I find myself in that situation. 'til then, all is speculation. That is more or less my approach though I do deliberately put myself in locations where I think they might be more likely to be. They don't have to silence them. All they have to do is attach a stigma to it. Which they have done so. This was going on with Commercial Pilots who had witnessed UFOs reporting it to the FAA. It was a great way to get your medical pulled. Step out of line and things will get hard for you. We know this tactic from other fields. If your a witness your either mistaken, a liar, a drunk or you belong in a padded room. There is zero chance in 2026 that the government doesn’t know Sasquatch exists. Military, Border and LE surveillance has picked up anomalies 100 percent. 🤷🏻♂️ We have them on highway cameras and even a eagle cam. There is no doubt in my mind there is better footage archived somewhere. So why the pushback? Why the obfuscation?
Recommended Posts