Why is the Forest Service and BLM so quiet about Bigfoot?

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Will said:

The wolves are an even better argument for you to make. I have been following closely what Colorado has done and how stupid it is. Certainly by allowing a certain electorate to vote on wildlife management laws. Did you know they don’t even allow foothold traps? And only two coyotes per day? Do they really think a coyote is gonna go in a box trap? Lol
 

But the fact is if that land was locked up and it had vast amounts of oil and the price at the pump climbed significantly like it has, it wouldn’t continue. And that’s my whole point. I don’t think it’ll ever get to that level….if they even recognize this creature. They’re not gonna lock up the entire state of Alaska, so it can frolic. Causing the elimination any drilling or mining of fossil fuels, along with rare earth minerals or even gold. 
 

Sure these groups will try and maybe a certain political party will support it because they need high fossil fuel prices but it would be turned around. Either by the courts or the legislatures. 

They would lock it up. Because they are.

 

I worked in the Bakken oilfield. Most of the field was in North Dakota. Where the motto was “drill, baby, drill”. But in Montana? We shut down for over a month for sage grouse mating season. The permits were not being written very fast either.

 

Complete sawmill towns were destroyed by the Spotted owl. Gone.

 

And as you said? The cattle industry is being eviserated by Wolves currently.

 

The “resource” they are trying to protect is evidently anything not for the betterment of mankind.

 

I am not an advocate for turning the whole thing into a asphalt parking lot. But most are not advocating a Amish lifestyle either. Most just want to have their cake and eat it too. They wanna live in a condo, with hot water and electricity, and a fully stocked box stores 5 minutes away while enjoying a pristine wilderness off their porch. 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

So back to Sasquatch? Obviously something else is going on because if it was a simple endangered animal? They would leverage its plight to the hilt.

 

But they don't. So either the creature doesn’t exist? Or there is a fly in the soup.

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Will said:

I agree there needs to be a body. I’m just fascinated that a body can even be considered when there isn’t any definitive evidence, even with all this technology for the past 10 years. Is that not striking to you?
 

I’ve been coming on this site for 20+ years and still nothing. We’ve gone from disposable cameras to some of the best camera and video equipment, then infrared and cheap night vision. 
 

Remember what night vision used to cost? First generation, second generation, third generation! 

And still nothing…. I do think there’s something to this big hairy beast, but I have yet to see or hear of a good explanation of what this is and why the government continues to keep it under wraps.

 

It’s the same with aliens. We all know they exist, but it is  still kept in secret

Nothing? There is a boat load of it. Heck they are on Eagle Cams for cripes sake!

 

You want answers…. I understand. But just like UAPs there is a incredible amount of pushback from the deep state.

 

And I dont see any of that changing any time soon unfortunately.

[Will]

8 hours ago, norseman said:

Nothing? There is a boat load of it. Heck they are on Eagle Cams for cripes sake!

Yeah, I just watched it. 
 

 

[Huntster]

14 hours ago, Will said:

..........Remember what night vision used to cost? First generation, second generation, third generation! 

And still nothing…........

There is a lot of heat sensing video out there claimed to be sasquatches. It's useless to prove anything. I pay it no attention whatsoever. If Patty is Bob in a suit, a red heat blob is even more so, even without the suit.

 

Three of the biggest photo evidence tool improvements over the past 40 years are cell phones, dash cams, and game cams. I have all three, but don't live in good sasquatch habitat, and my area has few reports. I use my game cam at bear bait stations. I have lots of pics of bears, foxes, wolverines, and even curious moose. Remarkably, over many years, not a single pic of a wolf, even though I've interacted with them many times in person. One of the most controversial game cam pics is the Jacobs pic. People still argue about what it is. There are lots of game cam pics of supposed sasquatches, and they prove nothing.

 

I only have one dash cam, and it's in my daily driver, primarily for legal reasons. I never installed one in my pickup/camper, and so guess which rig I had grizzlies cross the road in front of me? Do you have a dash cam? How many folks do you think do? I've seen numerous dash cam videos from police cars. Again, they prove nothing.

 

Cell phones? People get sasquatch videos on their phones regularly. One of my favorites is the Mission BC video. It proves nothing.

[Huntster]

14 hours ago, Will said:

...........apparently Bigfoot can live anywhere. 🤷‍♂️

I don't think they live in deserts. They might traverse them.

[Huntster]

14 hours ago, Will said:

.........They’re not gonna lock up the entire state of Alaska, so it can frolic...........

They locked up most of Alaska in 1980.

[Huntster]

13 hours ago, norseman said:

.........if it was a simple endangered animal? They would leverage its plight to the hilt.

 

But they don't. So either the creature doesn’t exist? Or there is a fly in the soup.

I think it's the ultimate minority in the soup.

[JKH]

5 hours ago, Huntster said:

I don't think they live in deserts. They might traverse them.

 

https://www.calexplornia.com/yucca-man/

[Will]

7 hours ago, Huntster said:

They locked up most of Alaska in 1980.

But not locked up for Sasquatch. 

[Will]

7 hours ago, Huntster said:

Do you have a dash cam? How many folks do you think do?

I don’t and I need to get one. I had a guy cut in front of me on the beltway and I still don’t know how he cleared me and the car diagonal from me. 
 

[Huntster]

1 minute ago, Will said:

I don’t and I need to get one. I had a guy cut in front of me on the beltway and I still don’t know how he cleared me and the car diagonal from me. 

 

Yeah, dash cams should be standard equipment for legal reasons. I caught some road rage the other day, and had it gone bad, I would have had it all on cam. I also almost got a guy on cam getting run over trying to cross the Parks Hwy on foot. I still can't believe he didn't get hit.

[norseman]

50 minutes ago, Will said:

I don’t and I need to get one. I had a guy cut in front of me on the beltway and I still don’t know how he cleared me and the car diagonal from me. 
 

Glad your OK!

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Will said:

But not locked up for Sasquatch. 

That is what Huntster and MIB have proposed.

 

If given some sort of indigenous rights? It might be more than “locked up”. It might not even be theirs any more.

 

My buddy is Lake band and they won their hunting rights back in Canada.

 

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2021/apr/23/colville-tribes-member-wins-pivotal-case-as-canadi/

[Will]

18 minutes ago, norseman said:

If given some sort of indigenous rights? It might be more than “locked up”. It might not even be theirs any more.

 

Can’t give rights to animals….how would they even accept them? They won’t even defend their new land. 

32 minutes ago, norseman said:

Glad your OK!

Thanks but I would have rather had that on video. I didn’t even have time to hit the brakes. Lol

[Huntster]

1 minute ago, Will said:

Can’t give rights to animals….how would they even accept them? They won’t even defend their new land. 

 

If the Sierra Sounds, Ostman story, Muchalat Harry story, and others strongly indicate a spoken sasquatch language, these creatures might very well be taxonomically categorized as of the homo genus, and thus they would be "human", just like Neanderthals, Denisovans, Florensiensis, etc. They would have "human rights". And yes, they wouldn't have any lawyers among their midst, but there are never shortages of homo sapiens lawyers (especially of the environmental type) who would love to represent them.