Why is the Forest Service and BLM so quiet about Bigfoot?

[Buckaloo]

1 hour ago, Huntster said:

 

If the Sierra Sounds, Ostman story, Muchalat Harry story, and others strongly indicate a spoken sasquatch language, these creatures might very well be taxonomically categorized as of the homo genus, and thus they would be "human", just like Neanderthals, Denisovans, Florensiensis, etc. They would have "human rights". And yes, they wouldn't have any lawyers among their midst, but there are never shortages of homo sapiens lawyers (especially of the environmental type) who would love to represent them.

If any part of our government admitted to the existence of Sasquatch, they would ABSOLUTELY be considered an indigenous people and would likely also be considered some sort of "uncontacted tribe." Legions of groups would step forward to lobby on their behalf and instead of just a small island being off-limits to visitation (as in the case of some uncontacted tribes), gigantic tracts of lands could theoretically be closed permanently.  The closure of public and private lands would be like nothing we've ever seen before.  It could be an economic Armageddon.

[Huntster]

22 minutes ago, Buckaloo said:

.........The closure of public and private lands would be like nothing we've ever seen before.  It could be an economic Armageddon.

 

It's hard to say how crazy it could get, but I'm sure it would be socially, culturally, economically, and even religiously traumatic. This is the primary reason why I believe that government just doesn't want to go there, especially since it's so easy to maintain the current mythology storyline. 

[norseman]

1 hour ago, Will said:

Can’t give rights to animals….how would they even accept them? They won’t even defend their new land. 

Thanks but I would have rather had that on video. I didn’t even have time to hit the brakes. Lol

If Sasquatch is some form of ancient human? Dunno. There is no precedent. And maybe the powers that be don’t want to find out.🤷‍♂️