Guest Llawgoch Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) Please, please, please,, people. please stop this idea that the TV company which paid for all this DNA testing would only have revealed the least sensational results. Or would not have delayed the transmission if something world shattering had been found. Nothing more is coming out of this. Edited November 10, 2013 by Llawgoch
Guest Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Just My opinion … from what I have read …… but Disotell seems to throw away a lot of stuff he doesn't understand. But he might just have some notes ( when questioned by Sykes ) … how quaint.
Lake County Bigfooot Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) Interesting stuff, I guess its the old wait and see again, grrrh... One of these times, one of these times... Mean while me looks for me own evidence... Oh wait maybe finding bigfoot comes through in the end uugh lol Edited November 10, 2013 by Lake County Bigfooot
Guest Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 recent post by Bigfootology that fills in some detail, and not! http://bigfootology.com/
southernyahoo Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 ^Wow, this a telling statement, as Rhetman appears to be speaking for himself and Sykes here. Again, we already know they exist; we want to know what they are. 1
bipedalist Posted November 10, 2013 BFF Patron Posted November 10, 2013 Please, please, please,, people. please stop this idea that the TV company which paid for all this DNA testing would only have revealed the least sensational results. Or would not have delayed the transmission if something world shattering had been found. Nothing more is coming out of this. Rhettman says Sykes paid for all sample processing out of his own funds, and has stopped pro bono work unless the tests prove interesting or positive on samples submitted from this point forward ($1500 otherwise). Can't you even wait for the National Geographic special two hour on November 17th, patience my dear Padawan, lol.
Guest Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Having met Rhettman, in my opinion he would have no problem using the "royal" version of we.
Guest Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 So bryan sykes admits he knows bigfeet exist.. wow
Guest Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 Dr Sykes didn't way that, Rhettman said "we". "We" could very well mean "Bigfootology", meaning "me"(Rhettman). Humble Rhettman isn't.
Guest Darrell Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 ^Whats so promising? Rhettman is the only one who says Dr Sykes believes in bigfoot.
Guest Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 The full results are to be published after peer review as Sykes himself has stated.
bipedalist Posted November 11, 2013 BFF Patron Posted November 11, 2013 http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/episodes/bigfoot-the-new-evidence/
Guest UPs Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 (edited) Anyone else who thought the picture of the casted print in that link looks very similar to a bear and not a bf? Thanks for posting that link biped. Edited November 11, 2013 by UPs
Guest Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 Dr Sykes didn't way that, Rhettman said "we". "We" could very well mean "Bigfootology", meaning "me"(Rhettman). Humble Rhettman isn't. As I recall ..... Rhettman made a statement about "Sykes encounter and now is a believer .... etc." right after a visit by Sykes. Seems like Sykes was on the way back home at the time.
Recommended Posts