Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Thought a poll to go with the thread might put some data on it. Vote away, but post on the thread, itself, so as not to derail it. http://bigfootforums...ings-are-false/ Edited November 10, 2012 by Kings Canyon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cowlitz2 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Does anyone know (a wild guess) how many sighting have been reported/recorded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 The same as any eyewitness in a crime. The reliability of witnesses is almost nil. Does not indicate they saw something, just the details are disputable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigantor Posted November 10, 2012 Admin Share Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) :lol: A statistical probability cannot be obtained from a poll. Edited November 10, 2012 by gigantor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 But an opinion on what the probability is can be, and that can be just as telling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigantor Posted November 10, 2012 Admin Share Posted November 10, 2012 True, but not with any measure of accuracy. It's just an opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Richard Stubstad (r.i.p) was a statistician. He claimed there is a 98% chance Sasquatch do exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cowlitz2 Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I like what you say JohnC....that is where I was headed with the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Is it even possible to have a negative statistical probability? The same as any eyewitness in a crime. The reliability of witnesses is almost nil. Not so. The issue is a lot more complicated. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110125092233.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 I vote j (Or i if you prefer) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 A lot of people on here have seen one. That throws 100% into the mix. That's better than any statistic. IMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 (edited) Edit to keep comments off here. Edited November 10, 2012 by madison5716 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 10, 2012 Share Posted November 10, 2012 Gigantor, It's not actually supposed to predict the probability, it's our opinion of the probability. Okay. the opinion of those who choose to vote and who hit the button they meant to click. Lord, these nerdy types......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted November 11, 2012 SSR Team Share Posted November 11, 2012 That tells him KC.. I voted for exactly zero % Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfooter Posted November 12, 2012 Admin Share Posted November 12, 2012 Does anyone know (a wild guess) how many sighting have been reported/recorded? BFRO has over 36000 on file. Add all the other sites and research organizations and individuals, probably pushing 50000 or so. But remember, it is suspected that most incidents are not reported. Also, of the incidents reported, most are not published, at least based on the BFRO. They only have a few thousand publically listed in their database. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts