Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 (edited) It's pretty much a foregone conclusion the Musky will *confirm*. Dyer has emphatically stated (radio blog) that IN NO WAY will he sabotage Musky's ability to view the body. Assuming Dyer isn't off his rocker, he will only accept a confirmation here. Why risk his whole gig NOW? It's entirely possible, however, that Musky could *qualify* his conformation by saying things like>>>>" I saw the body, but couldn't physically confirm due to constraints on my ability examine the body itself". In fact, that seems a more likely scenario here. Musky *gets to 3rd base*, but no HOME RUN. Edited February 4, 2013 by ronn1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 The whole story, bigfoot! Yeah and thats it Ihlyda - it makes us think and talk and laugh and worry and hope Its all part of life and far more fun than sitting in an office with grey walls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 As to the answer in #7 - of course his own video would be his biggest experience. That woodpile footage is superb. I see what you mean, but I still think if he has seen a video of RD shooting a BF, that would overshadow anything else out there. As to the woodpile video, let's just say I don't see what he sees. But he's obviously protecting the source/s who told him? He doesn't have to divulge the name. He hasn't even said "a trusted source told me ... " He doesn't betray anyone by just saying that. No names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I see what you mean, but I still think if he has seen a video of RD shooting a BF, that would overshadow anything else out there. As to the woodpile video, let's just say I don't see what he sees. I dont get the impression that he has seen anything necessarily, but that someone whom he trusts has told him? Maybe he has seen the full footage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Yes I'm more inclined to believe that Jackie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 I see what you mean, but I still think if he has seen a video of RD shooting a BF, that would overshadow anything else out there. As to the woodpile video, let's just say I don't see what he sees. He doesn't have to divulge the name. He hasn't even said "a trusted source told me ... " He doesn't betray anyone by just saying that. No names. Yes thats true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkGlasgow Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 You guys might be interested in this... I talked with someone who is in the documentary and they said that Minnow had used no costumes props during their portion of the film and that they would not have had funds for sophisticated CGI. My contact also indicated that Minnow wanted contrasts in it's choice of researchers, referring to Dyer, that they have won BAFTA awards and would do what they had to to make an excellent film. Lastly, the person said that the tent video was either a costume or the real thing. Interesting Violet. Yep Minnow chose Dyer because of who and what he is. There were no mistakes here. Minnow have been planning this film since 2008. The CFZ (Orang Pendek section of the movie) signed up as far back as 2009. Dyer's actions are most likely no surprise to Minnow. He has reverted to type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gershake Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 The whole story, bigfoot! The Ketchum report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest njjohn Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Same with Biscardi. They knew what they were getting. For someone that is spoken so highly of (the director), would he be that revered if he didn't properly research those in his documentary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 The Ketchum report? Wouldn't that be ironic.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 (edited) Who gets the center ring? Edited February 4, 2013 by lhlyda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkGlasgow Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Maybe he has seen the full footage? Now the footage..... No way would Chris Noel have seen anything from Minnow. If Dyer had any additional footage of a BF dead or otherwise it would be out there by now. NDA or no NDA. As an interesting aside, the skeleton of the English King Richard III were found recently. His bones were discovered back in August last year and DNA testing soon after confirmed the identity of the remains. This is big news back in the UK but the story only broke after the airing last night of a documentary on Channel Four detailing the discovery. I guess you know what I'm getting at here.... http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2013/feb/04/richard-iii-skeleton-last-plantagenet-king-live Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Oh maybe the race has really really begun....? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Musky said this today on FB/FB's facebook page. He also said he will give a full interview as soon as he gets back from Vegas. Musky Allen Jeff Kerstetter, You only know half the information. Ricks and his investors (individually) laid claim to ownership of the body. Each one had their OWN Non-Disclosure Document which consisted of 9 pages total. Minnow Films has nothing more than film Right ownership from my understanding. They are not part of the ND agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 4, 2013 Share Posted February 4, 2013 Well, Musky posted on FB during the time of flight on Monday, so we can assume it was not today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts