Guest gerrykleier Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I can't believe no one has any comments about the tent pictures I posted showing a hoax. I am speechless. I think most people presume it's all a hoax and feel no especial need to comment. There's next to no support for RD on this board as far as I can see, excepting 2 or 3 of the faithful. GK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I think most people presume it's all a hoax and feel no especial need to comment. There's next to no support for RD on this board as far as I can see, excepting 2 or 3 of the faithful. GK So very true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I think most people presume it's all a hoax and feel no especial need to comment. There's next to no support for RD on this board as far as I can see, excepting 2 or 3 of the faithful. GK you should go thru and inhance a sieries of frames, I would suggest the part were the costume is turning its head if you can show the the head and body not matching up in the move you might have something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 @ Cervelo- I am suggesting that since the title is Shooting Sasquatch and it is in the documentary category, not the Fiction category that there may be a dead Bigfoot in the movie. You won't see him shooting anything. It would be to disturbing for the main stream, I do think you will hear audio. In this fictional documentary. Can't wait for the drama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djj Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 (edited) Does anyone know when the BBC4 Storyville episode for Shooting Bigfoot/Of Monsters and Men is to air? TriBeCa is April 19-29 for the Festival. I thought the film actually would be on Storyville before Tribeca, which wouldn't be all that extraordinary if it is Of Monsters and Men....but Shooting Bigfoot would, I would think, hoaxed or real, likely have Tribeca as its real premiere. As far as getting people interested in the film, its working... Edited February 10, 2013 by Djj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 you should go thru and inhance a sieries of frames, I would suggest the part were the costume is turning its head if you can show the the head and body not matching up in the move you might have something. Look at the negative of the tent video I posted a few pages back. Shows to different shades for the same hair and you can easily see its a mask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DantheMan Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Not sun glasses? You can't see that? So what is protruding from BF's face?Look at the negative picture I posted. Eyes don't do that only sun glasses do. I will posts the negative of the Patterson picture of the face for comparison. Correct.....not sunglasses. How do you possibly know what a bigfoot face, or rather a bigfoot mask will or will not do in relation to shadows, depends on the makeup of the face, the depth of the eye sockets, cheeks, and brow ridge. *IF* it were sunglasses (which it is not) the Frame would be much more prominent and evident, especially going toward the ears. Don't bother with posting Patty's negative, it's pointless, unless you can prove that all bigfoots have the exact same facial features and they all have the same cheek depth, brow ridge etc.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Look at the negative of the tent video I posted a few pages back. Shows to different shades for the same hair and you can easily see its a mask. I saw that, but one frame dosn't prove or disprove anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Something tells me that the Rick Dyer situation is going to resolve itself soon, and it's leaning heavily towards "no body." Word is that there is unrest in the Dyer camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Something tells me that the Rick Dyer situation is going to resolve itself soon, and it's leaning heavily towards "no body." Word is that there is unrest in the Dyer camp. and were does the word come from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Here's my take: A world famous Hoaxer i mean Bigfoot tracker takes a film crew to Texas to search for Bigfoot. On the last night he hoaxes them by staging a fake Bigfoot to come into the camp for some ribs wearing a mask with sunglasses. Runs out and fires fake shots at Bigfoot supposedly killing it The film crew freaks out. Thinking he really did kill some thing. But calm down when the jig is up. They are not happy but they have some great video.... They get pissed at Mr. Famous for the prank on them and boot him from the film. They don't have to hype it cause RD is hyping it all over the place. Ricky and FBI/FBI get many hits on their web sites = $$$$ Minnow gets many wanting to see the film and they make money. A win win for all involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I just logged onto my facebook page and Project Sasquatch's Joe Mostrioianni had just posted to their page that he has had a death threat from Apro Hawk. I don't have a clue whom that is, does anybody else. Just crazy!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 and were does the word come from? From within. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Correct.....not sunglasses. How do you possibly know what a bigfoot face, or rather a bigfoot mask will or will not do in relation to shadows, depends on the makeup of the face, the depth of the eye sockets, cheeks, and brow ridge. *IF* it were sunglasses (which it is not) the Frame would be much more prominent and evident, especially going toward the ears. Don't bother with posting Patty's negative, it's pointless, unless you can prove that all bigfoots have the exact same facial features and they all have the same cheek depth, brow ridge etc.... You can SEE the side frame of the sunglasses. I will enhance it further to show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Shooting Bigfoot is part of the : TFI Documentary Fund Filmmakers & Projects http://www.tribecafilminstitute.org/filmmakers/tfi_documentary/faq/ Is my project eligible? The TFI Documentary Fund provides grants and guidance to exceptional filmmakers with character-driven, non-fiction works-in-progress that sit outside of the social issue landscape. By engaging in unexplored perspectives, the TFI Documentary Fund aims to take audiences into someone else’s environment and spotlight the journey of the individual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts