Guest VioletX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Djj- I really like your post, I think at this point Rick is giving more and more details out to keep the suspense, but unlike some things the Bf community is waiting on at least we are getting good snacks while we wait. I know that RD a nd Musky traveled to the location not long after his flight, so maybe that is one of the reasons... For secrecy maybe they do not want anyone there when staff is working, I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmaker Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Keep the suspense/drag out the hoax ....tomato/tomawto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 He claims the PGF is 100% genuine. Even Bob Gimlin admitted to the possibility he could have been hoaxed and he was there. Gimlin had to answer that way because that is ALWAYS a possibility. If you go to Africa and see a gorilla, it's possible you have been hoaxed. Did Gimlin really think there was any possibility that what he saw was anything other than a sasquatch? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopelyrics Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Gimlin had to answer that way because that is ALWAYS a possibility. If you go to Africa and see a gorilla, it's possible you have been hoaxed. Did Gimlin really think there was any possibility that what he saw was anything other than a sasquatch? No. I see. Do you think all the people on this forum who swear blind they have seen a Bigfoot could all have been hoaxed then? Is it a possibility? I guess so. I'm a bit confused here. You are saying that there is ALWAYS a possibility, but Gimlin didn't think there was any possibility, yet he answered there could have been a possibility? Why would he answer that there was a possibility if he believed there wasn't? Am I reading your statement correctly or missing something glaringly obvious? I have never been to Africa but I've seen a gorilla at the zoo. Is there a possibility that I was hoaxed? Thanks. Lee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 The point I'm making is that when he said that, he was painted into a corner. How could he say definitively that there was no chance at all he was hoaxed? Sure, there was a chance that someone was waiting there in a very convincing suit for someone to walk by. So, when pressed, he said it was a possibility, even though he didn't really believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I see. Do you think all the people on this forum who swear blind they have seen a Bigfoot could all have been hoaxed then? Is it a possibility? I guess so. I'm a bit confused here. You are saying that there is ALWAYS a possibility, but Gimlin didn't think there was any possibility, yet he answered there could have been a possibility? Why would he answer that there was a possibility if he believed there wasn't? Am I reading your statement correctly or missing something glaringly obvious? I have never been to Africa but I've seen a gorilla at the zoo. Is there a possibility that I was hoaxed? Thanks. Lee It's possible yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 @NiceGuyJon Possibility and probability, P&G, the possibility that he was hoaxed are small and the probability is high that he wasn't hoaxed, but this one, without a doubt, is the opposite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 That I do agree with, I was just saying that I don't agree with using Gimlin's quote that it was a possibility as any kind of indication that he believed anything other than he was looking at a real live animal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adam2323 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Conjecture half truth unknown sources in the end we just have RD word. And historically his word is no good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Anyone noticed that the film poster is now gone from this guy's website? http://www.notanothercreative.com/project/shooting-bigfoot/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockape Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) Gimlin had to answer that way because that is ALWAYS a possibility. If you go to Africa and see a gorilla, it's possible you have been hoaxed. Did Gimlin really think there was any possibility that what he saw was anything other than a sasquatch? No. Yes, he has said it was possible he was hoaxed, he also said something like he felt Patterson MIGHT have "led him" to that spot. However, it would have been a very stupid thing to do, as Bob was armed with a rifle. In fact, it was when he crossed the creek, jumped off his horse and drew down on Patty that they got the "head turn". So if Patterson was hoaxing Bob, he was playing a very dangerous game. There is no way he would have known Gimlin would not take a shot at it. Edited February 11, 2013 by Rockape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Anyone noticed that the film poster is now gone from this guy's website? http://www.notanothe...ooting-bigfoot/ Maybe it was not supposed to be out yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WldHrtRnch Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 ^^Obviously. Possible some NDAs are being violated, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) RD was not even sure it was THE film poster, he assumed it was. I think someone sent it to him, if I remember correctly. Edited February 11, 2013 by VioletX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest flycatch Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 It is human nature to lie and we all do it in some form or another. Is Rick Dyer lying to us about the truth and the whole truth. I would say yes however his lies are for deception. Does Mr. Dyer have a real bigfoot body? I would say that he does have a body either real or manmade. Most of the people in the bigfoot community rely to much on heresay and not scientific evidence. The only evidence I support are samples of footprints and most of these are hoaxes. All the other nonsence such as; rock throwing, stick breaking, gifting are proof of nothing that can be proven. If what Mr. Dyer claims to have accomplished it real than you bigfoot researchers need to change your mindset. It took only four years according to Mr. Dyer to bring this mystery to an end. The funny thing is that he used the most common method to lure a creature into a trap and that was bait. I'm not a hunter but is this not common practise for those who hunt deer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts