Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Yes but he says there are camps 1,2 &3, who knows where they are located compared to the original location and what kind of strategy he is using. Re; the weapon, does Dyer say if this is the one he used?? You know you can always ask him these questions on his FB... Which you realize - begs the question yet again - who are these other people taking up camps 2 & 3. If you think one of the camps is the film crew - think again. I guarantee you those people do not research. They have their camera's pointed at other people while they are out in the woods and most often go back to civilization to stay at a hotel. Why? They have to re-charge their batteries for the cameras etc. Why have we heard nothing from these other people involved? Hum.. Simplyska is right - all we have is Dyer's word for all this and as far as I am concerned his word isn't worth anything. JackiLB - the military facility is Lackland Airforce base. Good luck getting on that property without a dang good reason for being there. Bigfoot is not a good enough reason. Cisco - Can you print out a picture of Dyer and ask if they recognize him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 @ Melissa, you make reasonable points, ones I have thought of. My disbelief is not of someone, anyone shooting a BF, it is of how there are no leaks... If we can figure that out, it may glue all of the puzzle pieces together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) I hate being wrong - so give me a few to get this right. I edited this. Edited January 25, 2013 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) Which you realize - begs the question yet again - who are these other people taking up camps 2 & 3. If you think one of the camps is the film crew - think again. I guarantee you those people do not research. They have their camera's pointed at other people while they are out in the woods and most often go back to civilization to stay at a hotel. Why? They have to re-charge their batteries for the cameras etc. Why have we heard nothing from these other people involved? Hum.. Simplyska is right - all we have is Dyer's word for all this and as far as I am concerned his word isn't worth anything. JackiLB - the military facility is Lackland Airforce base. Good luck getting on that property without a dang good reason for being there. Bigfoot is not a good enough reason. Cisco - Can you print out a picture of Dyer and ask if they recognize him? Camps 2 & 3 - I think RD had a group of trackers with him so I guess they were spread amongst different camps? As for the camera crew, if you are making a film with a grant of £250k budget, (thats $39495000.00) I doubt you would allow your camera-people to go off to stay for the night in a motel. lol No, they would have been there 24/7 for the period allotted to filming in that location. The film makers are not sasquatch researchers - thats not their job they were there to film. Edited January 25, 2013 by JackiLB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest paradigm Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Mel, that was a typo I made. I went there in December and was told by a homeless person that a film crew had been out there a few months ago. I assumed they were talking about RD's crew. However, they never specifically mentioned RD or Minnow by name. Again, that was my assumption. Hopefully, I'll be able to go out there again this weekend, for some follow up. If anybody has specific questions you want me to ask or something you want me to look into, please post them on this forum. I plan on checking out the property behind the Home Depot, as well as trying to get more detailed info from some of the homeless people camped in the area. , I would simply request clarification on whether or not the land specified by Racer X is Air Force property or otherwise inaccessible to the public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I hate being wrong - so give me a few to get this right. I edited this. Blimey mate! ARe you Melissa Hovey??? , I would simply request clarification on whether or not the land specified by Racer X is Air Force property or otherwise inaccessible to the public. Oh no that damned RacerX - my nemesis. LOL Are YOU RacerX by any chance? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) Blimey mate! ARe you Melissa Hovey??? Oh no that damned RacerX - my nemesis. LOL Are YOU RacerX by any chance? LOL lol, she is indeed Melissa Hovey ; ) Yes, who here is Racer X?? Haha Edited January 25, 2013 by VioletX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cisco Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Well, I briefly watched the video, on mute, so I could take a look at the rifle. Does he mention anything about it? He certainly made a point to film it for a while... I can't tell much about the rifle, other than it's a center fire so, even a small caliber bullet, would have a lot of velocity, especially at the range in which he claims to have shot the Bigfoot. As I mentioned, I've taken a lot of head shots with a 22/250 which is a high velocity cartridge, with a very small bullet, and it is devastating when it hits the head. I'm assuming RD would be the "type" to go for a larger cartridge. So, he would likely have a .30 caliber or .27 caliber rifle which could cover a very wide variety of loads and cartridges. It could be as large as a 300 mag or as small as a 270. Regardless, any of the larger calibers would have done the following: 1. Made an enormously load noise 2. In that area, would have attracted the authorities. 3. Would have removed the Bigfoot's head, or most of it. There is NO WAY his shot would have just knocked out two teeth. It would have decapitated the Bigfoot and traumatized the film crew. If you have never seen something shot in the head; it's very disconcerting and very messy. Also, the concussive noise from the rifle would have attracted the police. There's no way you could fire a gun like that, in or near the city and not have a response from LE. Last but not least, depending on the distance and RD's experience as a shooter, he may not have been able to hit his target. I know it sounds crazy but I've seen it happen. RD's rifle has telescopic sights and he claims to have shot the Bigfoot from a very short distance. When shooting a rifle, with a scope, you have to be good at judging distance so you can compensate for the rise or drop of the bullet. If your rifle is "sighted in" for a 100 yards and you aim at something 400 yards away, you have to raise the cross hairs to compensate for the "drop" of the bullet over the greater distance. The same holds true for targets that are very close as the opposite effect, from long distance shooting, happens, in that the "bullet" is rising on order to be dead on at 100 yards. I've seen a friend of mine miss a doe at 70 feet because he had the cross hairs right between her eyes. The bullet went over the does head because it was still rising. You can see how RD's story does not make sense in several ways. The shot would have done much more than just knock out two teeth and the noise would have attracted unwanted attention. Not to mention, he may have missed, depending on his experience and circumstances. As an aside; what happened to the two teeth that were "knocked" out. Perhaps he can show us a photo of those? How about the hair, pieces of blood, bone and brain that were blown all over the place? That's a lot of biological evidence.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 (edited) @ Melissa, you make reasonable points, ones I have thought of. My disbelief is not of someone, anyone shooting a BF, it is of how there are no leaks... If we can figure that out, it may glue all of the puzzle pieces together. I have never heard him speak about field partners.. So this idea of him working with someone else - would absolutely be news to me (and others I am sure). No one has come out in his defense to say they were there and this is what happened. They could verify many things - and not break an NDA. I signed an NDA with Monsterquest - but I was still allowed to say I was part of the show, which one it was, and where we researched. I highly doubt a filming company would care if those details are leaked by anyone involved. It depends - do you like Melissa Hovey or don't you. If you like her, then Yes - its me. If not - I can't stand that chick !! lol. But I am not RacerX. I don't post under fictions names.. Why? My imagination sucks. Cisco said: It would have decapitated the Bigfoot and traumatized the film crew. You're probably right - but I quoted you because I wanted to say -- Man, you do have a way with words. LMAO!!! Edited January 25, 2013 by Melissa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 I have never heard him speak about field partners.. So this idea of him working with someone else - would absolutely be news to me (and others I am sure). No one has come out in his defense to say they were there and this is what happened. They could verify many things - and not break an NDA. I signed an NDA with Monsterquest - but I was still allowed to say I was part of the show, which one it was, and where we researched. I highly doubt a filming company would care if those details are leaked by anyone involved. It depends - do you like Melissa Hovey or don't you. If you like her, then Yes - its me. If not - I can't stand that chick !! lol. But I am not RacerX. I don't post under fictions names.. Why? My imagination sucks. But you have got to remember that this particular bigfoot, was different. It was old and maybe not too well. The tracking/killing skills sound like they were totally different to the 'norm' and I think this is why (maybe) someone (RD) was actually able to shoot a bigfoot. The whole scenario was unusual but not dis-believable? I have never heard him speak about field partners.. So this idea of him working with someone else - would absolutely be news to me (and others I am sure). No one has come out in his defense to say they were there and this is what happened. They could verify many things - and not break an NDA. I signed an NDA with Monsterquest - but I was still allowed to say I was part of the show, which one it was, and where we researched. I highly doubt a filming company would care if those details are leaked by anyone involved. It depends - do you like Melissa Hovey or don't you. If you like her, then Yes - its me. If not - I can't stand that chick !! lol. But I am not RacerX. I don't post under fictions names.. Why? My imagination sucks. Cisco said: You're probably right - but I quoted you because I wanted to say -- Man, you do have a way with words. LMAO!!! No I dont think you are RacerX - was asking if Paradigm was RacerX? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Cisco, maybe this data will help with your investigation! According to weather records for that area, there was no rain between Sept 1-10. Wind directions are as follow with average mph. 1- SSE, 10 2- SSE, 11 3- SSE, 10 4- S, 9 5- SSE, 8 6- SSE, 7 7- S, 5 8- NNE, 11 9- N, 6 10- E, 5 Wind directions are important, remember he used the smell of ribs to lure BF into camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 But you have got to remember that this particular bigfoot, was different. It was old and maybe not too well. Sounds to me like if this particular animal was old or not well - it would have been easier to track for a number of reasons.. Not sure why this would make tracking so difficult.. I don't know that any thing about this was "different" - I am assuming you are going by what Dyer said. I don't do that. But, I understand your perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thepattywagon Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 He says in the clip VioletX posted, "Thank you for all your support....and all the negativity. We enjoy 'em both." This is probably the only truthful thing we'll ever hear from this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Plus 1 for Pattywagon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Sounds to me like if this particular animal was old or not well - it would have been easier to track for a number of reasons.. Not sure why this would make tracking so difficult.. I don't know that any thing about this was "different" - I am assuming you are going by what Dyer said. I don't do that. But, I understand your perspective. Its not just by what Dyer has said, its the homeless camps reports too. Why should their accounts go amiss just because their stories are connected to a Rick Dyer kill story? The sightings reports since 2009? should be pretty good evidence to assume that maybe maybe, there is a sasquatch in that area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts