Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I wonder if Mr. Musky will avail himself of the opportunity to view the body this weekend. I wonder where the body supposedly lies in state. Las Vegas was bandied around by someone I read. Pawn Stars pawn shop will probably haggle and reject the body. The alligator farm in Louisiana may have it stuffed and used as an exhibit as the Alligator Boys rescue alligators and maybe wandering, lost BigFoots and re-home them at their swamp. Unless the Hoffman Crew and Young Parker Schnabel think there may be alluvial gold layered into the twenty thousand foot deep sedimentary deposits of the Mississippi Delta, and attempt to strip the four miles of overburden to get it, and lease the swamp. Ax Men loggers may have sunk their own Skunk Ape Bodies in the oxygen depleted bayous having found a way to protect them from the gators and scavengers, only to be found by Troy "Choot Em! Elizabeth" Landry looking for Ole "T Rex" along with John Fogertys' Blues Junior Fender amp on the end of his guitar cord playing "Old Man Down The Road". Or Not lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I have been thinking about a few things and would like any feedback? 1) Red Herrings Maybe Dyers vague and confusing location hints are Red Herrings? A couple of years ago here in the UK, a wildlife photographer/reporter released photos in the National Press of an unusually large red deer Stag and named it the 'Exmoor Emperor'. Well soon enough swarms of trophy hunters turned up on Exmoor (an area of the uK) looking for the beast. They asked locals etc and it turned out months later that the stag wasnt actually living on Exmoor but 10miles east. The guy had deliberately given it the name with Exmoor as a red herring to protect the animal from being shot. (Didnt work as later someone eventually found it). Rick Dyer doesnt seem to want people to know the exact location of where the kill happened does he? Red Herrings?? 2) Dyers behaviour prior to the 'kill Last week VioletX posted some videos from YouTube that Dyer had filmed of himself in the days between 1-5th September giving updates on his expedition. What I found really interesting about these films are that I saw Dyer behaving very differently to how I have heard/seen him in other footage (both 2008 hoax footage and any other exposure I have viewed/listened to since Sept). He isnt confident, laid back, humourous and annoying but anxious, stressed and distracted. Particularly anxious I would say. Why is this? Is this the behaviour you would expect from someone who is about to stage another hoax? Is he anxious in case he misses the opportunity of finding a real bigfoot with a camera crew there? Or something else? The films reminded me of a documentary I once saw called 'grizzly Man' which was all about Timothy Treadwell who was obsessed about grizzly bears. The film shows the guy filming himself thoughout and talking about the bears. Then, one day his behaviour is different, anxious and hyper and then half an hour later a grizzly attacked him and ate him! It was as though he sensed that something was going to happen as you see this change in him in the footage prior to the attack. Anyway, perhaps Rick Dyer sensed something? Perhaps he sensed that the bigfoot would appear and he had already decided that he would shoot it. I dont know, but why is Rick anxious in those films? 3) Bigfoot name When I listened to his radio show last week a caller "pinkfoot' asked RD whether he was going to give his bigfoot a name. I noticed that Dyer was pretty weird about this and seemed quite edgy about the idea. Do hunters name their quarry? I know animals are named (eg The Exmoor Emperor) whilst they are being hunted, but do hunters give their quarry a quirky or affectionate name? I dont think so and infact if the last image Rick Dyer saw of the bigfoot was it dead with a bullet through its face, I doubt he could bring himself to give the poor creature a name. I think this is an interesting thought to consider. 4) Dr Sykes and his DNA study Now I know that its been reported that Dr Sykes hasnt even started his DNA testing despite having a very organised agenda in place https://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/academic/GBFs-v/OLCHP (PUBLICATION PHASE November – December 2012) but whats happened to this? We are past the date with no updates on the site. When Rick Dyer was asked how many scientists were working on his bigfoot his said 3. If that is the case, what are the chances that Sykes is one of them? If there is a real body for Sykes to carry out his DNA studies on, then surely the Hominid project would either be delayed or even aborted altogether? You know, despite the logistical anomalies in this story I still believe Rick Dyer shot a bigfoot. Its certain behaviours along with a few facts that have convinced me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopelyrics Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Ah come on - I dont believe this! I am UK based and I even know someone who is a cameraman for the BBC and I still cant get any info on the film!! Why would your cameraman friend know anything about this? Unless he/she worked on the documentary, or knows someone personally who did, I can't see how they would be privvy to any piece of information. Minnow are an independent company who make documentaries not just for the BBC. And despite the fact I don't know MarkGlasgow from Adam, for some reason I believe him over Rick Dyer. Why would he be lying? Lee Edited January 27, 2013 by dopelyrics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 I've lost interest in this story. Think about it, if there was a major discovery like this, Sept 6, 2012 almost 5 months ago. It would have already been out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Why would your cameraman friend know anything about this? Unless he/she worked on the documentary, or knows someone personally who did, I can't see how they would be privvy to any piece of information. Minnow are an independent company who make documentaries not just for the BBC. Lee Dopelyrics I was responded to MarkGlasgows post which said that he is UK based and he has inside knowledge about what Minnow films is up to. My comment above is in response to that. ie I am saying that just because he is UK based doesnt mean he is pals with Minnow and I said that I know someone who is a cameraman for the BBC and I STILL dont anymore about this. Do you get what I mean?This is what Mark Glasgow said: Violet - I'm UK based and managed to find out quite a bit more about the forthcoming doc from a very good source. It's shaping up to be a very good film which will be of great interest to us all but not for the reasons stated in this thread. Edited January 27, 2013 by JackiLB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Dopelyrics I was responded to MarkGlasgows post which said that he is UK based and he has inside knowledge about what Minnow films is up to. My comment above is in response to that. ie I am saying that just because he is UK based doesnt mean he is pals with Minnow and I said that I know someone who is a cameraman for the BBC and I STILL dont anymore about this. Do you get what I mean? This is what Mark Glasgow said: Violet - I'm UK based and managed to find out quite a bit more about the forthcoming doc from a very good source. It's shaping up to be a very good film which will be of great interest to us all but not for the reasons stated in this thread. I wish Mark would get back to us o clarify his statements, I had asked him to explain how well connected this source is to Minnow Films. IMO the fact that Mark did not go into how he knows this person knows what he or she is talking about either means he does not want to exploit a confidence or he is leaving us a little scrap here to taunt us,lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Why would your cameraman friend know anything about this? Unless he/she worked on the documentary, or knows someone personally who did, I can't see how they would be privvy to any piece of information. Minnow are an independent company who make documentaries not just for the BBC. And despite the fact I don't know MarkGlasgow from Adam, for some reason I believe him over Rick Dyer. Why would he be lying? Lee Yeah whatever! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Jacki-I think that RD said he has named the Bigfoot Hank, possibly because one of his "backers" is a certain country star. I am not sure if Rick was just joking around and I cannot recall where I heard this, I think on one of his BTR shows???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Jacki-I think that RD said he has named the Bigfoot Hank, possibly because one of his "backers" is a certain country star. I am not sure if Rick was just joking around and I cannot recall where I heard this, I think on one of his BTR shows???? Oh ok. It was on the radio show last week? He seemed very reticent to give it a name? Hank? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopelyrics Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Yeah whatever! Thanks JackiLB. That explains it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Thanks JackiLB. That explains it. Eh? Explains what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VioletX Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Oh ok. It was on the radio show last week? He seemed very reticent to give it a name? Hank? I really can't remember when I first heard it, he has mentioned it more than once, or maybe other people have brought it into the conversation, could have been a month or more ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dopelyrics Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 JackiLB - on a forum that is be about intelligent debate, I was expecting something a little bit more cerebral than "Yeah whatever!" in your response to my questions, that's all. But, hey - whatever! Best, Lee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Somebody asked Musky Allen on Facebook when he was going to see the body. He said his lawyer is reviewing a 9 page disclosure document given to him by Dyer and that there are a lot of people involved with it until he can see the specimen. He also said that the disclosure is to keep him from taking photographic, video, and audio evidence, but as of now it looks like he can tell anyone he wants what he sees. He said there is no reason for him to go if he can't at least do that. He also said it shouldn't be much longer and he will tell the community everything as soon as he returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 JackiLB - on a forum that is be about intelligent debate, I was expecting something a little bit more cerebral than "Yeah whatever!" in your response to my questions, that's all. But, hey - whatever! Best, Lee Ah Dopelyrics. Last week you stressed me out a bit and I felt like you were determined to argue with me for the sake of it. Maybe I got you all wrong, but I got quite stressed. I think you may criticise anything I say and I dont have the energy. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts