WSA Posted January 20, 2014 Posted January 20, 2014 Brian, Apologies if this has been covered previously, but did anything come of any analysis of the blood stains on the rocks following Daryl Colyer's encounter the other year? Cheers Stan, my recall is that all the excitement and confusion of the event got in the way of a concerted effort to gather evidence and the blood was noticed only after it had sufficient time to weather and degrade. I recall Bipto commenting it was too far gone to yield any useable DNA, although how that was determined, I don't recall.
Drew Posted January 20, 2014 Posted January 20, 2014 I believe Bipto said they sent it out to a DNA testing firm. But the lab did not return any results, and further efforts to get them to provide results met deaf ears.
BobbyO Posted January 20, 2014 SSR Team Posted January 20, 2014 Looks like another thread pretty much ruined, great..
Guest Stan Norton Posted January 20, 2014 Posted January 20, 2014 BobbyOLooks like another thread pretty much ruined, great.. I hope not BobbyO. There are still plenty of us here who are interested and have genuine queries.
Guest zenmonkey Posted January 20, 2014 Posted January 20, 2014 Maybe if we are really good the messiah bipto will return lol seriously though he needs to come back
WSA Posted January 20, 2014 Posted January 20, 2014 Awww..I'm guessing not. Bipto's hide is not that thin, doesn't appear to me.
indiefoot Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 The constant attempts to turn this thread into another debate on whether BF exist caused Bip to bow out. It has had the same affect on lots of folks.
Doc Holliday Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 (edited) but instead of bowing out, how about just using the "ignore" feature?? if bipto and enough of the interested parties discussed who is who via PMs , then put the usual suspects on ignore the conversation could carry publicly on if there is anything left to say . interruptions that fall on deaf ears might blow away on the breeze with little or no attention....... just a suggestion. Edited January 21, 2014 by Doc Holliday 1
Airdale Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 Plus that Doc. Since I heard about the ignore option several months ago, I implemented it three times the first day and once more a bit later. Can't say for certain that that was responsible for bringing my blood pressure back down to a healthy range, but it didn't hurt. I enjoy a healthy, challenging, on topic discussion amongst grown-ups as much as the next person but am easily bored by seemingly endless repetition. Life's too short for boring BFF! Looking forward to fresh news from N.A.W.A.C. as things heat up, literally and figuratively, in X. 1
Drew Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 If someone makes a claim that Giant Hairy beasts are hucking rocks at cabins, I think the logical counter question is "Do you think an animal that hucks rocks at cabins would not have been killed by the people living in those cabins?" If Bipto wants to make this into a thread where no one can question his claims that is fine, but I think it is quite clear in the rules that claims are allowed to be questioned. And at the same time, the rules state that if you make a claim you should be able to handle the questions that come with it. I think this is Bipto's way of terraforming this thread into a format that allows his claims to go unquestioned. A Bigfoot Forums Genesis project if you will. 2
Painthorse Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 (edited) Well sir, I do believe that the majority that has had an interest in this thread is more interested in what Bipto has to report or explain than your constant "repeat recording style of questioning". His patience from the beginning has been much appreciated. Edited for bad speeling, lol Edited January 21, 2014 by Painthorse 1
Cotter Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 If someone makes a claim that Giant Hairy beasts are hucking rocks at cabins, I think the logical counter question is "Do you think an animal that hucks rocks at cabins would not have been killed by the people living in those cabins?" If Bipto wants to make this into a thread where no one can question his claims that is fine, but I think it is quite clear in the rules that claims are allowed to be questioned. And at the same time, the rules state that if you make a claim you should be able to handle the questions that come with it. I think this is Bipto's way of terraforming this thread into a format that allows his claims to go unquestioned. A Bigfoot Forums Genesis project if you will. ^Do you have any evidence to back up that claim? 2
Cotter Posted January 21, 2014 Posted January 21, 2014 (edited) "I think this is Bipto's way of terraforming this thread into a format that allows his claims to go unquestioned." ;-) Edited January 21, 2014 by Cotter
Recommended Posts