Drew Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 If it is human, you don't have to, just follow the curve. Did you read the blog? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ksu4 Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 (edited) A 7' tall human is an outlier. http://sucolex.blogspot.com/2011/11/human-height-and-weight.html This blog has a scatter chart of a large sample of humans, you can see that the 7' tall end of the scale is a small outlier percentage of the graph. 700 600 A 7'6" 600lb Bigfoot? --> o 500 **previously-posted image removed** I believe the confusion lies with your graph--I read it that ssq is approximately 36" tall... Edited July 8, 2014 by ksu4 To remove previously-posted image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LarryP Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Anybody can make claims on the internet, even with math. Including the Smithsonian. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 Neither do you. I do endeavor to remain nit free. They tend to attract those who feed on them and I find it disconcerting to be groomed by such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 8, 2014 Share Posted July 8, 2014 (edited) So, in this thread, pointing out actual real facts is an impropriety? That's some odd logic. Anyway, I will vacate this one. It's too depressing. Might I recommend you read some books? Hugs and love to you Stan...Susi I believe the confusion lies with your graph--I read it that ssq is approximately 36" tall... No, I am actually 5 feet 3 inches.. Edited July 8, 2014 by SweetSusiq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 That's 36" if you're dyslexic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 Here- This should resolve any confusion, I redid it as a photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 9, 2014 Share Posted July 9, 2014 Including the Smithsonian. Can. Are they likely? Not as much as some random blogger with no credentials . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 10, 2014 Share Posted July 10, 2014 Including the Smithsonian. has the smithsonite made a recent claim about the bones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 http://www.wideopenspaces.com/michigan-father-daughter-discover-skeleton-rare-extinct-elk/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=WOS%2BDaily&utm_campaign=WOS_newsletter_8.10+-+wos+main Oh yeah, they killed the last Eastern Elk around 1880 During the logging days in Michigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redbone Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 (edited) So... I am watching a History Channel show that is very interesting. Jim and Bill Viera found a giant human looking tooth in the Ozarks as well as the original microfiche news reports that actually have a picture of the skeleton found in 1933 in this same cave. The newspaper stated that the skeleton was shipped to the Smithsonian. I have not found much more on this online yet but I sure want to know what comes of this... I feel it's worth bumping this old thread. Here is a link: http://www.history.com/shows/search-for-the-lost-giants/videos/tooth-discovery EDIT: I found an episode summary here: http://dailytwocents.com/search-lost-giants-recap-episode-two-find-solid-proof/ Edited November 15, 2014 by Redbone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 This guy was just on Coast to Coast, but I missed it. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/pages/marzulli-11-13-14-images Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest crabshack Posted November 15, 2014 Share Posted November 15, 2014 (edited) ^ Anyone have more info on Ron Morehead and those 28" tracks he supposedly had seen that were spoken of in that interview? the show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fl847ExD8o&list=PL8PiVFwsoAwI4CxgA99X8h45UxA_Cnf0N Edited November 15, 2014 by crabshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cotter Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 ^Interesting coast to coast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 13, 2015 Share Posted February 13, 2015 (edited) The Native American Indians, the first inhabitants of the Northwest Territories and later Wayne County and finally decreed as the state of Michigan, do indeed claim there giants of evil men, Yam-Ko-Desh or Prairie People as they were called, inhabiting the state long before them. Three of the largest groups in Michigan being the Ottawa’s, Ojibwas, and the Potawatomi’s recognized these giants existing in Michigan as being so vast in number, “they were as thick as leaves on a tree.†Remarkably the giant people or mound people were not exclusive to Michigan, they were found all over the United States. “Yam-Ko-Desh,†the Ottawa name for the mound builders meaning "the prairie people.†Source: "Primitive Man in Michigan," Dr W.B. Hinsdale, 1925 Source: Michigan's mysterious Indian mounds, By Vivian M. Baulch / The Detroit News June 6, 1997 “the Prairie people, who were "thicker than the leaves on a tree." It is believed that the Ottawas, Ojibwas, and Potawatamis formed an alliance to exterminate them.†Source: "Primitive Man in Michigan," Dr W.B. Hinsdale, 1925 Source: Michigan's mysterious Indian mounds, By Vivian M. Baulch / The Detroit News June 6, 1997 Giants North Leslie, 21.5 m., is part of the village of Leslie. At its western edge, along Rice's Creek, INDIAN MOUNDS cover a tract of 15 or 20 acres. Among the bones unearthed were a human skull, so large that no hat in Leslie could be found to fit it and a thigh bone three inches longer than that of the tallest man in the village.â€North Leslie, 21.5m., is part of the village of Leslie. At its western edge, along Rice’s Creek, Indian Mounds cover a tract of 15 or 20 acres. Among the bones unearthed were a human skull, so large that no hat in Leslie could be found to fit it and a thigh bone three inches longer than that of the tallest man in the village.†Source: A Guide to the Wolverine State, 1941, pg 504 [ingham County] Giants Michigan Giants of Old During the investigation of the mounds in Pokaagon township, Cass county, Mich., the bones of perhaps 100 persons were found in the center of one mound and under these, separated from his companions, were the bones of a man who in life must have been fully nine feet tall, occupying a sitting position, with his feet under him. Source: National Labor Tribune, March 2 1899, pg 7. Edited February 13, 2015 by Gumshoeye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts