norseman Posted January 8, 2015 Admin Share Posted January 8, 2015 LOL! So would I! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I'am thinking only if the big guy let yah........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) ^^^ LOL! …. That’s okay I knew what was meant …. But now in the interest of full disclosure, I wasn’t going to run the risk of embarrassing anyone and decided to let it slide. I had my own nightmare experience with cohabitating, and it wasn’t a Bigfoot either…. but I’m not telling on myself either… LOL … We just do dumb things when we’re young. When we are older and wiser we are fortunate (albeit a little poorer) that we can stand back and chuckle at our own naïveté and foolishness … LOL …. P.S. That's why B.B. King wrote that song, that I thought was for me personally proclaiming "It's cheaper to keep her," and Oh how he was right... J Edited January 8, 2015 by Gumshoeye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuchi1 Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 I don't think there's many people having problems with Bigfoot hanging around their houses/yards. But I was asked by a property owner here how to keep them away from the back of his house. I told him to light up the backyard at night. Seems to work. Chris B. Or, invite the crew of Finding Bigfoot to do an episode there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JiggyPotamus Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 I would not advise antagonizing the sasquatch unless there is a very good reason. If a bunch of animals are coming up missing, if someone's livelihood is threatened because of this, or if there is some other legitimate reason for wishing to get rid of the animals then I can understand such a choice. If the animals are not hurting anything, or if there is a way to accommodate them, this would be the best course of action in my opinion. I would not be worried about the sasquatch becoming violent, but it is possible. You might get a crazy one, or a really aggressive male, and that might not be a chance one would be willing to take. They probably would not charge you or anything, but there is not much you can do to get them to leave. The only two options are to A.) take away their reason for wishing to stay there, and B.) scare them away. They are afraid of gunfire a lot of the time, if certain sighting reports and even videos are to be believed. But it would be difficult to know when they are hanging around so you could even fire a weapon. I'm not sure that they would be scared away completely though. The best idea is to somehow accommodate them, or take away their reason for being there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodslore Posted January 10, 2015 Author Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) The best idea is to somehow accommodate them, or take away their reason for being there. Thank you for your input JiggyPotamus. The first part of this quote seems to be a common idea but I have a really hard time believing this to be the best idea, in all situations. If this is done with an other animal it quickly becomes a problem. Be it rodents, canines, cats, apes, bears, deer, etc this is often thought to be a bad idea. The second part makes me curious though. If an animal is use to a certain food source or interaction taking that away can trigger an aggressive reaction. As it has been said before if a person is feeding an animal and they move away, someone else buys the property what then? Are they just suppose to keep up with the previous action? It seems as though it is a setup for an endless cycle for people. It seems as though this could be a cycle for people to fall into a scenario, or a setup for people to find themselves where they feel they need a Plan B. That is if the aggressive action or fear of aggressive action is believed to be possible. We are talking about an animal believed to be between 6-9 feet, even 10 in some cases, feet tall. With a weight between 400-1000 lbs. People are going to see it as a threat and believe it capable of causing considerable harm and damage. An animal that has been feed by humans sees humans as a source for food thus take it and confrontations with people are a real possibility. Even stating well you could drive them out but they might not really leave the area just stay out of sight, does seem to fit. If the animal is still in the area and coming into or onto the property at night, or when it believes no one notices there is still a potential danger to be noted. Again in the cases of animals such as bears, or moose for that matter, once they have been driven off and they keep coming back getting into garbage cans or gardens whatever a more permanent solution is taken. The animal is often met with force.Yet this seems to be a taboo in the Sasquatch community. It is as though there is a separate set of rules for dealing with such a creature. As if a person or persons must forgo their life (not mortal form) to play subject to the creature. I find this to be interesting. Though please note I am not meaning to attack anyone or offend anyone given my views or questions. I am simply curious and wishing to engage the people of the form for their thoughts. As a community of people interested in the subject of Sasquatch, be it a believer or a flat out skeptic we cannot truly go forward without learning from one another and examining the various perspectives put forward. Everyone sees things differently. Edited January 10, 2015 by Woodslore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts