Jump to content

Cascades Carnivore Project - How Do They Miss The Bigfoots?


kitakaze

Recommended Posts

I'm sure you're aware that all you have to do is search the BFF to come up with multiple BF accounts from retired Rangers." LarryP

 

Obviously I am aware of that as I mentioned it in a previous post.  My point was how can they be trusted in their BF reports when we also know that they will destroy evidence..at least that is what DWA tells us.  So I am going to choose to not trust any of those gubmint types when it comes to bigfoot.

 

So Larry, I see you answered part of my question, but not all.  Do bigfoots know what a camera is for? Do they know it is for recording an image? If so, how do you know this?



"They do?

 

Please elaborate." LarryP

 

Santa Claus, Easter Bunny...unless you believe those to be real organisms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LarryP

I'm sure you're aware that all you have to do is search the BFF to come up with multiple BF accounts from retired Rangers." LarryP

 

Obviously I am aware of that as I mentioned it in a previous post.  My point was how can they be trusted in their BF reports when we also know that they will destroy evidence..at least that is what DWA tells us.  So I am going to choose to not trust any of those gubmint types when it comes to bigfoot.

 

 

 

 

 

So you have proof that all Rangers can't be trusted? 

 

Or did you put that in the same place as the Groundhog?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Grifter9931

So you have proof that all Rangers can't be trusted? 

 

Or did you put that in the same place as the Groundhog?

 

Larry the same can be said vice versa..

Where is the proof that all Rangers can be trusted???

Just another circular argument.

Edited by Grifter9931
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, DWA tells us that officials cannot be trusted. So why would I trust any sighting reports that come from such an untrustworthy source? If you want supporting evidence, Larry, I suggest you ask DWA, it was his claim to begin with. 

 

Don't hold your breath, though, he makes quite a few claims and then shows empty pockets when it comes to supporting evidence.

Edited by dmaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Urkelbot

You'd have more fun if you'd just try to figure out what's causing the evidence, and actually explain it, rather than just pleading with us to believe you.

NOT THAT YOUR OPINION IS BEING SOLICITED OR ANYTHING, BUT IT CERTAINLY WON'T BE UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY START THINKING ABOUT THIS THE RIGHT WAY.  jUST SAYIN'.

And Until That Fine Day Arrives, I am taking those geologists and that ranger - just them alone - over anyone who thinks no pictures and lots of cyberpushpins constitute heavy lifting.

I am guessing much like the nawac your geologist and park ranger have no verifiable photographic or physical evidence either to support their opinions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LarryP

 

Don't hold your breath, though, he makes quite a few claims and then shows empty pockets when it comes to supporting evidence.

 

Like your claim about the Groundhog?

 

 

ghog.jpg

Edited by LarryP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, Larry what is your point? I said when watching footage that I don't doubt the authenticity of the animals in the footage as I believe I can tell between a fake and a real animal. As in, I don't doubt that the the penguins in Frozen Planet, for example, are real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Grifter9931

"Retired Park Rangers have confirmed bigfoot" -LarryP

 

Really? Where's the body.

They haul them off to be buried.... Shhhhhh it's a secret place, over the river and through the woods....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admin

^^^^^^^^

As I showed you in the spoof video? People cannot tell the difference between a fake and a real gorilla at five feet...... Let alone a photo.

I do not put any stock in photos because they do nothing advance proof.

And this thread proves that.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how many Bigfoot corpses the corrupt wild life officials have swept under the rug?  It must get pretty stinky under that carpet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admin

Extremely impressive post on this subject, unfortunately over-looked, little understood...

We have the same statistical data for elk hunting season and hunter success rate per game management unit. Total Population, density, tags sold and hunter success rate.

Typically it's 10-20 % , which means statistically every 5-10 years of hunting the same area a hunter should logically expect to harvest an elk right?

Wrong. Generally speaking it's always the same small percentage of hunters that kill elk annually.

If your doing it wrong? Your doing it wrong......and playing the odds doesn't mean squat. If you stink, are noisy, cannot track and cannot identify prime habitat, then your going home empty handed.

And this is species specific, you may be a great prairie dog hunter but know nothing about elk or cougar. Each species has its own challenges.....

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...