Drew Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 Many Bigfoot research teams find their cameras missing. They assume that Bigfoot took the cameras, because they were angry at the cameras or something. Reality is, that the cameras caught a human on film, and the human disassembled the camera and took it. I believe this happened to the MRP people up in N. Michigan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbear Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 (edited) I lock all my game cameras to the "decent sized tree" they are strapped to. Not because I fear BF or other animal will take them, but because I know that if a person finds it they will most likely steal it. The locks are even only a deterrent, a person could still get the camera if they were determined. So far I have not had one stolen. Edited January 20, 2014 by bigbear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitakaze Posted January 31, 2014 Author Share Posted January 31, 2014 U.M.A.!Posted on the Cascades Carnivore Project blog site on January 22nd, 2014 under the heading "What is it?"... http://cascadescarnivoreproject.blogspot.ca/ It certainly deflates the notion that the CCP would conceal possible evidence of Bigfoot.Like the CCP staff that posted it, I am not sure what it is, but if I hazard a guess, it looks to have the same fur pattern of the two deer that were caught on the same camera shown just before that image. In the lower right corner of the shot is what appears to be more of the animal, maybe the back. The hair is very short with light skin underneath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted January 31, 2014 SSR Team Share Posted January 31, 2014 It looks like the alleged Owl that was caught on the game cam in Maine or wherever it was in the North East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockape Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 It looks like the back of someone's head to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted February 1, 2014 BFF Patron Share Posted February 1, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roguefooter Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 Wow I had no idea that's how little time it took to film "Bigfoot", I wonder why he kept the camera so long.... Probably to film the documentary he was making? Nobody else, not even NAWAC, has put the effort into actively hunting for the animal that P and G did to get that film. You could look it up. "Bob Gimlin, a friend of mine, and myself had been in the area a little over a week." - Roger Patterson Nice try Kit, but you already know that Patterson had been hunting throughout the 1960's. Gimlin's participation was only in 67 (that we know of) in areas like St. Helen's and Bluff Creek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted February 1, 2014 Share Posted February 1, 2014 ^^^Hey, man, cherrypicking is a SKILL! A MAD SKILL. We should just admire and appreciate the mad skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitakaze Posted February 1, 2014 Author Share Posted February 1, 2014 Nice try Kit, but you already know that Patterson had been hunting throughout the 1960's. Gimlin's participation was only in 67 (that we know of) in areas like St. Helen's and Bluff Creek. Quoting Patterson himself on how long he was at Bluff Creek was in reference to DWA using Gimlin's stating that he and Roger were at Bluff Creek for three weeks while ignoring Roger saying it was one week. DWA's false claim is that prior to the NAWAC's Operation Endurance, no one has made more than a three week full-time stay in the woods looking for Bigfoot, which is just completely wrong. Also, yes, Patterson spent seven years prior to the PGF Bigfooting, yet there are still plenty who've spent longer than that; Byrne, Dahinden, Green, Morgan, Noll, Randles, ; really, it's 2014, the list could go on and on. You're right. It pays to be informed. I have said it many times and history says I'm right: long-term field insertion brings results. Before Endurance, there was P/G. Period. Here you have an animal that no full-time effort has ever been devoted to bringing back for a period longer than three weeks. DWA, on 08 Jan 2014 - 12:46 PM, said: P and G went in ready....and look what they got. Nobody else, not even NAWAC, has put the effort into actively hunting for the animal that P and G did to get that film. You could look it up. "Bob Gimlin, a friend of mine, and myself had been in the area a little over a week." - Roger Patterson Last Saturday they arrived to look for the tracks themselves and to take some films of these, riding over the mountainous terrain on horseback by day and motoring over the roads and trails by night. - Roger Patterson interview, October 20th, 1967. http://www.bigfooten...es/firstpgf.htm Far longer at Bluff Creek than one week and starting seven years earlier, with a far better tracker... http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/bluff-creek1960.htm Far longer at Mt. St. Helens than one week... ^^^Hey, man, cherrypicking is a SKILL! A MAD SKILL. We should just admire and appreciate the mad skill. And what is favouring Gimlin's three weeks while ignoring Roger's one week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitakaze Posted February 2, 2014 Author Share Posted February 2, 2014 (edited) It looks like the back of someone's head to me. Definitely a possibility. Could be a CCP member or other person checking the camera. I don't think it to be the CCP member that uploaded it to the CCP blog, since they are asking for opinions for what it is, though there is the possibility they are just posting their own head for fun. Biologists/conservation workers get bored too. Edited February 2, 2014 by kitakaze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyO Posted February 2, 2014 SSR Team Share Posted February 2, 2014 What is the possibility of it being a Sasquatch in your mind ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitakaze Posted February 2, 2014 Author Share Posted February 2, 2014 As compared to it being a joke, a person, a known animal like a deer, I'd say about like a 0.01% chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Urkelbot Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 What is the possibility of it being a Sasquatch in your mind ? Haven't you heard the workers/researches would be fired if they released photo evidence of bigfoot. Roswell dude Roswell.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squatchy McSquatch Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Bigfootery, dude. FigBooterY... YGNALI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DWA Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 I'm sure what you guys posted is interesting. But I think the essential points have been made here, and we're kinda done, until the CCP comes clean on all the bigfoot evidence it's encountered, or accepts that not encountering anything it accepts as bigfoot evidence really means little, if anything, when anyone with common sense, and knowledgeable about this topic, knows they are either in denial or totally unwilling to shoot their credibility with their handlers by talking taboo. Oh yeah, that Parks Canada video. A number of animals native to that region weren't on it. Do we presume those animals don't exist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts