Bonehead74 Posted October 22, 2015 Posted October 22, 2015 (edited) Although still publicly supporting the Ketchum DNA study, Paulides has been incrementally backing away from it since Dr K's paper was released. You'll find that the last blog entry about Ketchum was around the time of the study's publication. Paulides has stated that with the DNA study, he feels that he has accomplished what he set out to do in the bigfoot field, namely, to prove bigfoot's existence. That makes him either extraordinarily naive, pathologically untruthful, or almost wilfully ignorant. None are good choices. Edited October 22, 2015 by Bonehead74
Trogluddite Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 ^ Just for the sake of getting lost in the weeds, he could also be shamelessly prevaricating ...
Recommended Posts