Jump to content

Bigfoot Growls Are They Really From Them.


ShadowBorn

Recommended Posts

Moderator

^^ The problem once something either drifts into woo or requires woo to carry on is that woo never delivers anything except more woo.  When I consider that the general history of bigfoot like animals is anything but paranormal.   Now presumably intelligent people are investing in the woo machine.  Indeed it is going the way of fairies, gnomes and unicorns.  But it offers absolution for never acquiring physical proof.  

Crowlogic

What do you mean "it offers absolution for never acquiring physical proof" ?Nothing nor should anyone of us except the absolution for never acquiring physical proof. Physical proof is what it will take to prove these creatures and the paranormal aspect of this creature should be left to the paranormal. Stay with in the physical realm since the paranormal just throws screws in the whole mess of understanding these creatures.

 

If people want to go on the portal thinking side then who cares . We cannot prove it just like any other aspect of the paranormal part of these creatures. so why dwell on it where it will only lead one to head aches and hard ship. Stick to the flesh and blood part of these creatures since there is more info on that. Also does it matter whether they are human or ape or a new species when we have no idea on where they survive. This is why there is a paranormal section on the forum to discuss these issues.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello ShadowBorn,

Nicely worded post. I know I'm speaking out of turn here but I do think Crowlogic's point IS just what you are saying- and for that matter what I am saying as well. Sasquatch, while not proved NEEDS to remain in the realm of the physical animal kingdom like the rest of us and not in a position of something untouchable. It has been known to kill dogs, drink water, jump fences, eat berries, shake trees,chase cars, run up steep hills, growl, stink to high you know what, leave prints, and a lot of other things all stemming from it's physical nature.

My side of things is if it was a portal creature then it wouldn't need to do ANY of those things. So yes, if it exists, which I strongly lean towards, it is fully a creature originating and based on this Planet- and always has been for a long, long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Crowlogic

Since the arrival of the portal issue I have already heard it voiced by otherwise intelligent or previously level headed people that it is unreasonable to ever expect physical proof of bigfoot since it is according to them a paranormal entity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Crowlogic,

For all the proof we have (not) it may a well be, eh? ;) So yeah, the portal thing is a bit of cop out.

Edited by hiflier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Admin

^^^^

Portals are real its called a couch!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I worked for a portable rock crushing outfit, I swear we had a portal pottie. Because every time my foreman went in it he wouldn't come back out until 30-40 minutes later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello CMBigfoot,

When I worked for a portable rock crushing outfit, I swear we had a portal pottie. Because every time my foreman went in it he wouldn't come back out until 30-40 minutes later.

That's because it really wasn't a "portable" rock crushing company- it was a PORTAL rock crushing company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moderator

When I worked for a portable rock crushing outfit, I swear we had a portal pottie. Because every time my foreman went in it he wouldn't come back out until 30-40 minutes later.

CMBigfoot

See the portal part of your story is not what is bothering me about the paranormal part of the experience. What bothers me is the part that you as an employee is taking the time to time your boss in a portal potty. That means that your are physically  watching him or should I say observing him from a distance and timing him on companies dime. That in itself is spooky and should be considered paranormal in my thinking. To be gone in a portal potty for 30 to 40 mins well that's some travel or should I say some pushing.

 

Who knows what star constellation he seen while in the portal potty doing the deed. But I sure as heck not going to care about what or how long my boss takes while in the head.    

 

What I do care is that if there was portals there would be people showing up in different area of the world trying to figure out how they got there. If there are worlds with in worlds well then this could explain missing people. Unless you have experienced these portals your self then it is best to stick to the flesh and blood. Since evidence does point to a living creature and not to a paranormal creature it would be to the best interest to science to stay with in the flesh and blood.

 

In my case I have experienced both the paranormal and the flesh and blood. To myself I am more comfortable with the flesh and blood since the paranormal is difficult to prove. Like Crowlogic paranormal can be used as an excuse to why they cannot be proven and that is a very poor excuse to use. It is a shame that it has to come down to paranormal as an excuse to why they cannot be proven. If they bleed then they can be solved and that's all there is that is needed. Their blood sample or a body and the results have to be kept secret until it is put together with out any faults before it is made public. Names must be not named of who ever shoots this creature which means no credit. If the truth is to be told then the shooter need to remain anonymous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...