norseman Posted January 1, 2016 Admin Posted January 1, 2016 Its an example that the whole decade 1960-1970 was blurry.....
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted January 1, 2016 Posted January 1, 2016 The more you zoom in on an image, the more blurry and pixelated it'll look. Zooming out shows that the entire frame itself isn't blurry.
hiflier Posted January 1, 2016 Posted January 1, 2016 Hello OntarioSquatch, I've said it before and I'll say it again......Patty is an absolute hottie!
Guest OntarioSquatch Posted January 1, 2016 Posted January 1, 2016 Without any hair, she would look almost identical to a regular human being, not like a chimp or a gorilla.
JDL Posted January 1, 2016 Posted January 1, 2016 (edited) Its an example that the whole decade 1960-1970 was blurry..... Understood, thanks. The whole decade was blurry for a lot of folks who didn't even have cameras. Edited January 1, 2016 by JDL
norseman Posted January 1, 2016 Admin Posted January 1, 2016 LOL.... Here is a film of Bigfoot shot in 62, I think the PGF is way clearer..... http://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/finding-bigfoot/videos/investigating-the-1962-colorado-mystery-footage/
Guest Cryptic Megafauna Posted January 4, 2016 Posted January 4, 2016 Well I can see from that photo that Patty does not have a head shaped like any human i have ever seen. I can see a very pronounced brow ridge and a very peaked head. And she has no neck......none, even Schwarzenegger is jealous. Although no neck the cervical vertebrae would still exist just exist below the shoulder line
Recommended Posts