Guest Cryptic Megafauna Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 The guy that killed the oldest living thing in the world (a tree) runs when ever he is recognized. (8000+ years old) Oops, it was a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incorrigible1 Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 There's an older creature that is known to hang around the Tar Pit. The Huntster is over 10K years old, at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuchi1 Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 ^^^^ Sounds like Yuchi speaks from experience! Whoa! And, some of us are doomed to repeat the ninth grade, over, and over, and over......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MIB Posted March 18, 2016 Moderator Share Posted March 18, 2016 ^^^^ Just waiting for you to catch up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cryptic Megafauna Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 (edited) Bigfoot is hunting you, to think otherwise is the illusion. He has no need of pesky science. Edited March 18, 2016 by Cryptic Megafauna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Crowlogic Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 ^And you of course have proof that bigfoot is hunting us? By all means share it. You are in the right place to share it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cryptic Megafauna Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 (edited) He is hunting you, in particular, Kit. Either that or running for the hills. Edited March 18, 2016 by Cryptic Megafauna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 I understand that in some jurisdictions it is a different matter if you bait an area and that the charges can be more significant if you do so. Would I be taking too much of a risk if I were to put lipstick on a couple of cows and used them for bait? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I am pro -kill, but don't do it here. http://www.skamaniacounty.org/commissioners/homepage/ordinances-2/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Walker Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I am pro -kill, but don't do it here. http://www.skamaniacounty.org/commissioners/homepage/ordinances-2/ In 1984, the ordinance was revisited and the felony charge was dropped to a misdemeanor carrying a one year jail sentence and $1000 fine ... The question remains, why were Sasquatch preservation laws created and upheld? Without adequate sources detailing the thoughts and motivations of the men who petitioned for Sasquatch preservation laws, we cannot know definitively why they are on the books. Seemingly, in 1969 and 1991, something motivated individuals to protect the Sasquatch. Considering the language in the 1969 ordinance, it seems fueled by a desire to protect innocent campers and hikers from accidently being harmed by Sasquatch hunters. The 1991 ordinance seems to have been created to publicize the Bigfoot at Baker Fest... source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarArcher Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 ^^^^ Sounds like Yuchi speaks from experience! Whoa! And, some of us are doomed to repeat the ninth grade, over, and over, and over......... Best three years of my life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuchi1 Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I am pro -kill, but don't do it here. http://www.skamaniacounty.org/commissioners/homepage/ordinances-2/ In 1984, the ordinance was revisited and the felony charge was dropped to a misdemeanor carrying a one year jail sentence and $1000 fine ... The question remains, why were Sasquatch preservation laws created and upheld? Without adequate sources detailing the thoughts and motivations of the men who petitioned for Sasquatch preservation laws, we cannot know definitively why they are on the books. Seemingly, in 1969 and 1991, something motivated individuals to protect the Sasquatch. Considering the language in the 1969 ordinance, it seems fueled by a desire to protect innocent campers and hikers from accidently being harmed by Sasquatch hunters. The 1991 ordinance seems to have been created to publicize the Bigfoot at Baker Fest... source Appears public safety was at the core of this statute. Hmmmm, novel idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted March 19, 2016 Admin Share Posted March 19, 2016 Well we better cancel outdoor activities during Deer season then!! Its a war zone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yuchi1 Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 ^^^ So, you're saying you can't tell the difference between a four-legged ungulate and a bipedal hominid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted March 19, 2016 Admin Share Posted March 19, 2016 No I can tell the difference, so much for your "novel" idea. But please dont stop sounding like a bleeding heart who worries horribly for "public safety". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts