Jump to content

News Feed - Is There Archaeological Evidence Of Bigfoot? (Part Ii) - Ancient Origins


Guest Admin

Recommended Posts

Guest Admin
Posted

Is There Archaeological Evidence of Bigfoot? (Part II)

Ancient Origins

To briefly review, Mitchel Townsend was featured in an article that announced that they had found archaeological evidence of Bigfoot and challenges scientists to refute their findings that the chewed bones they found are evidence for Bigfoot's existence.

Posted

This is just a rehash of what they said in October last year. I tried contacting them at the time with no answer. We wrote and sent them an email that we were willing to share with them and discuss our research and the evidence found. Still no acknowledgment from them.

Nothing has changed from their side. If any are interested in reading the rebuttal to this it is here:

http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/51524-what-about-the-bones-research-paper-now-available/?p=932994

Or here. The one below in the research section and also includes a review of her paper:

http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/52574-my-rebuttal-to-the-lisa-bright-blog-comments/?p=933910

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...