Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 I for one think this whole Sierra Shooting thing is fabricated...fully and completely!
Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Well, the DNA results should speak for themselves. DR
yowiie Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 (edited) I tend to agree Maybe Justin should run tours, fill up the back of the truck at $25.00 a head and drive up there give a guided tour, way better than any video. Yes, and if the story is true, lets hope the remaing BF don't recognise him Edited July 24, 2012 by yowiie
Guest Shaun Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Careful here guys. Justin is a member here, and some of the posts here are getting a little close to calling him an outright liar. General Guideline 2, as a gentle reminder: 2. Do not make things personal. Attack the argument, not the arguer. No name calling. Terms like ‘liars’ and ‘idiots’ are beyond the pale and will not be tolerated here. Lets keep it on topic, and not make it personal please.
Guest slimwitless Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Agree with Corvus and great point by slimwitless. The crux of the matter is that they have dna currently being tested by two independent labs. Possibly three labs if Sykes has a piece. Someone on this forum thinks DR revealed that a piece of the Sierra shooting sample was sent to the Oxford study. I don't know where this person heard that but I missed it. Derek, can you confirm or deny?
Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Oxford does not have a sample of the flesh. We submitted a unrelated hair sample to Oxford. If Oxford got a flesh sample it was not given to them by me. You would have to ask Justin that question. DR
Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Hello everyone My first post I have read everything I have found about bigfoot since the PGF This is a great forum but still with everything I've read I'm still skeptical Sorry I'm still trying to believe I wouldn't call anyone a liar or an idiot but I do have questions about JS 's story would you pick up a wounded animal if you shot a 40# animal in the neck it would be dead before it hit the ground I thought I read that DR sent someone to the site with a dog JS said he took his bloodhound to the kill site Do I have this wrong My memory is not what it used to be JS doesn't know what bullet he shoots In my 25/06 I shoot winchester 115 gr ballistic silver tip I know dead animals don't last in the field but I think bones would be more likely to last longer than flesh I could be all wet about all this if I'm wrong please get me pointed in the right direction I enjoy reading everyones post Thanks
Guest slimwitless Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Thanks Derek. Justin? In my opinion, it would be shame if Sykes doesn't get the opportunity to test this particular sample.
Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 I'm not sure if this is still accurate, but Dr. Meldrum told me that Sykes is mainly focusing on hair. That could be evolving but I'm not sure. I'll ask him again and post his answer. DR
Big Stinky Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Derek while we have you here and excuse me if you had answered this already but can you confirm that the pictures of the flesh/hair sample that have been floating around are what you are familiar with. Thanks Derek and hang in there ! Big Stinky
BobbyO Posted July 24, 2012 SSR Team Posted July 24, 2012 (edited) I'm not sure if this is still accurate, but Dr. Meldrum told me that Sykes is mainly focusing on hair. That could be evolving but I'm not sure. I'll ask him again and post his answer. DR Maybe that's his main focus, but i highly doubt he'd turn away something like we're talking about.. http://www.wolfson.o...ic/GBFs-v/OLCHP Edit to add : " In order to avoid misidentification of samples due to contamination, our preferred material is hair, although tissues will be considered. " Edited July 24, 2012 by BobbyO 1
Guest Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Big St, Believe it or not that's the first time I saw that picture when it hit the internet. I do have pictures of the flesh sample but they are different pictures. It does appear to be the same material. DR
Guest poignant Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 So many differing accounts...makes you wonder if everyone is pulling on the same rope or if the project had not already been infiltrated by special interest groups to stymie / confuddle things. In any case I'll take it at face value that there are two labs testing the sierra kills samples. Look forward to the results from the other lab. Would it violate the NDA if the sample was sent to another lab and that other lab published the results? Fingering this possible loophole here...
Guest gershake Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 That's sort of worrying, that Derek says it's a pic of the sample and Ketchum says it isn't. :/ I think Ketchum may not always be entirely honest.
Recommended Posts