gigantor Posted October 9, 2021 Admin Share Posted October 9, 2021 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackRockBigfoot Posted October 9, 2021 Share Posted October 9, 2021 Interesting… The figure moved pretty smoothly for someone wearing a padded suit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twist Posted October 9, 2021 Share Posted October 9, 2021 Hard to make out detail but interesting either way. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockape Posted October 9, 2021 Share Posted October 9, 2021 Meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfooter Posted October 9, 2021 Admin Share Posted October 9, 2021 I only saw one, which appears to be looped. What am I missing? Otherwise, it looks interesting, a better than average blobsquatch. The eerie music does not help either, it always sets me on alert status. At this point I would say probably no cigar, at least until more analysis is done. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norseman Posted October 10, 2021 Admin Share Posted October 10, 2021 Waaay better than the last one. It’s not a bear or a leaf. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiiawiwb Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 (edited) I'm not pursuaded for two reasons. The legs look longer to me than they should. Patty was massive from the waist up and her legs, to my eyes, appeared thick but short. This figure has fairly long legs compared to the torso especially if you add the portion of the lower leg not visible. In real life, things happen randomly. I find it curious the "object" just happens to be positioned right in the middle of the film. I'd have to ask my math-professor buddy how to calculate the odds of that occurring but I bet it is probably very small. I would expect something to catch a person's eye causing him/her swing the camera over, in small measure or large, to capture, then focus on the movement. No reason swing left or right here because the figure is already smack dab in the middle. It looks like a setup to me. Edited October 10, 2021 by wiiawiwb 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VAfooter Posted October 10, 2021 Admin Share Posted October 10, 2021 To me this looks like a very short snippet of video, what does the before and after look like? I had the same suspicions as wiiawiwb, but figured that they were only showing the "best" of the video. My guess is that they saw something and focused in on it, a part which is not shown in the above video. This too adds to the lack to the lack of credibility for me. If go to the YouTube page, it seems most of the commenters have a lot of the same questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCdSIiJZ0gM And of course, where was this filmed, when, who, etc.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson-Gimlin Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 Thanks for sharing. I don't understand how one can film several creatures with one average size person in a costume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7.62 Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 Looks like it missed leg day at the gym 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthWind Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 I find it suspect that each creature seems to stop at the same spot and look around. Seems posed and planned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twist Posted October 10, 2021 Share Posted October 10, 2021 There will be any detail made out of this video. It’s Lacking any details. It’s just a fun blobsquarch video. Anything more than that is fools gold. It’s better than some and as useless as most. Just now, Twist said: There will not be any detail made out of this video. It’s Lacking any details. It’s just a fun blobsquarch video. Anything more than that is fools gold. It’s better than some and as useless as most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinwalker13 Posted October 11, 2021 Share Posted October 11, 2021 I've seen this one floating around the last couple days and I'm with @wiiawiwband @VAfooter . i only see one subject and when I blew it on a 64in monitor it looks like there is faint tracing or mapping visible. Plus, as @wiiawiwb stated it is DEAD center and the odds lf that in a video that didnt even notice a squatch until after when looking over the footage. (which was what I read initially). It is interesting but really hard to make out with the way the pixels get blown out with the zoom. I would love to have the original footage and run it through our software and blow up the image propperly to see the real detail. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xspider1 Posted October 13, 2021 Share Posted October 13, 2021 The legs seem disproportionally long compared to the legs of our average, scientifically confirmed, Bigfoot. However, it does have a distinctly shaped 'diaper butt' so, I give it a maybe... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CelticKevin Posted October 15, 2021 Share Posted October 15, 2021 Yeah...no. Looks fake to me. "Multiple: squatches? Looks like one just looped. And how amazing that this stealthy creature is bounding into an opening in the rock face and crouching down like some player in an 80s B-movie action reel. Also very lucky the camera man had his phone pointed at just the right spot. If this was real, the creature would've been in and out before the videographer could've gotten his camera ready I suspect. It just screams, "Look at me! I'm really a Bigfoot!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts