Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 And maybe we are talking about two different things totally. Evolution doesn't stop just because we arrived, bigfoot may be the next stairstep down the ladder on his way up. This other paranormal stuff may or may not be related to bigfoot even if it seems to be connected when first observed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Hair? Makes physical more likely. But not definite. UNless you get a hair follicle bit. DNA? Yes, physical but maybe also able to ....I don't know, evaporate at will. ive heard of the past supposed hair samples being collected as well. your point on the follicles raises a question. have any of the hair samples in the past had the follicle still attached? if so, id suggest that points towards a F&B something , imo. combine that with other possible physical evidence and the case for para squatch seems a little weaker than F&B, imo. as far as a combination of the two, idk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RioBravo Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 A point I often make is to consider that we arose about a billion years after life ought to have been possible in the universe. Imagine that for a second. A civilization just a few thousand years more advanced than we are would be pretty well beyond our understanding. Now a billion.. Everything we take to be spirit or paranormal may simply be technology that is a billion or so years old -- so advanced, we can only call it magic. Do my eyes deceive me? THE Blogsquatcher? Welcome back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HairyGreek Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 And maybe we are talking about two different things totally. Evolution doesn't stop just because we arrived, bigfoot may be the next stairstep down the ladder on his way up. This other paranormal stuff may or may not be related to bigfoot even if it seems to be connected when first observed. Wouldn't this fly in the face of what Evolutionist believe as there is nothing remotely similar to what we see described as Bigfoot except perhaps gigantopithecus? Giganto as yet shows no evolved fossils after their sudden disappearance from the fossil record around 300k years, correct? I find it hard to imagine that evolutionary biologists have claimed they have discovered all of mans evolving fossil record, but none of giganto evolving if it happened after the 300K mark. Seems odd to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 It would be odd if you are convinced that Sasquatch is Giganto's descendant. Sasquatch might be something we haven't seen before and the theory of evolution is constantly being revised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HairyGreek Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 It would be odd if you are convinced that Sasquatch is Giganto's descendant. Sasquatch might be something we haven't seen before and the theory of evolution is constantly being revised. Hmmm...sounds like you may have some interesting theories on what it may be. Is that the case? Would love to hear... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 My fist question is, what is time before anyone was around to measure it? What does it really mean and how is anyone so sure what seems like happened over millions of years did not happen in a single instant with all the elements compressed and assembled to resemble what could look like billions of years? What does time mean without sentience involved really? Sorry, getting philosophical. You are getting philosophical, but to my mind, unnecessarily so. We don't need to go farther than the bounds of our current knowledge to ask the question I posed. If Bigfoot is connected to a million year old technology, you would think they would understand the importance of a bath considered the smelly and unkempt appearance most describe. If this is a guise to keep others at a distance, why not just morph into a skunk? So as to not raise suspicion and still keep others away. You make some assumptions there that are maybe not warranted. I'll point just to the most obvious one -- who is to say that bigfoot is the creator or holder of the technology instead of the product of that technology. We send a mars rover to mars, but if we could have sent a self-sufficient hairy fellow instead, I can't imagine that we wouldn't have done so. That's a nice Thor-like theory you have there, but it doesn't work for me. Doesn't mean you may not be right, it just doesn't seem to fit into anything Bigfoot related anyhow. This thread is putting me in the "kill" camp. Well, you are just indicating the limits of your willingness to speculate there. "Doesn't work for me" does not constrain reality in any way at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) It would be odd if you are convinced that Sasquatch is Giganto's descendant. Sasquatch might be something we haven't seen before and the theory of evolution is constantly being revised. good point, seems the theory of evolution is in the process itself. goes to show maybe some things arent as concrete as currently taught. imo, i figure there may be lot we don't really know about the tangible things,much less the para stuff. Edited August 27, 2011 by slicktrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Do my eyes deceive me? THE Blogsquatcher? Welcome back! It is! But I'm not back in the sense that you might think. I came by to point out that the new video grab of the "sleeping bigfoot" really seems to me to point more toward hoax than ever. Of course I haven't seen the video yet.. Then I stumbled into this thread where people are talking about a little pond and I thought I'd point out that it's really an ocean of possibilities. We need to understand that we don't know squat about anything, let alone bigfoot. Whatever that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Biggie Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 good point, seems the theory of evolution is in the process itself. goes to show maybe some things arent as concrete as currently taught. imo, i figure there may be lot we don't really know about the tangible things,much less the para stuff. Any theory is not concrete but people forget that even when theories are always changing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Biggie Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 We need to understand that we don't know squat about anything, let alone bigfoot. Good to always remember that and stay humble yet we as a people forget that and act like we know everything. Pride is our downfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Any theory is not concrete but people forget that even when theories are always changing. yessir, i agree.thats why its called a theory, ideas in motion i suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spader Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Nothing you see or read about regarding paranormal investigation is going to get you proof but it may indicate whether there is an increase in the EMF field when bigfoot is near, just take an EMF meter with you when camping and see what happens when the rocks or pine cones start flying. I would ask Chip Coffee( one of the few psychics I think is legitimate) to come and spend a weekend at a habituation site to see if his presence there attracted them, if so, if it was possible to get a read off the intent of the creatures. I've seen those ghost boxes they use, take one of those and see if anything comes through at a site were there have been a high number of reports or a habituation. For infrasound detection, you may have to build something that picks up vibrations and can be viewed and recorded on an oscilloscope. Natural infrasound waves could be ruled out by doing base readings on the area, knowing flight or train schedules, that kind of thing. Bringing in a psychic/medium is a thought that has never occured to me. There are some pretty strange accounts of encounters with a Bigfoot. I don't throw out the notion of the paranormal being associated with bigfoot, but am pretty sure it is a flesh and blood creature. As far as an EMF detector goes, from watching all of the ghost hunting shows one needs to be pretty close to detect an anomaly, so I don't think that particular notion wouldn't be practical, you would rather have a camera in your hand rather than an EMF detector if you were that close. As far as a psychic/medium goes that might be interesting. You mentioned Chip Coffee from Parinormal State, he claims to be able to detect entities that the rest of us can't see or can't even detect their presence. Chip Coffee is more of a celebrity psychic, he claims to not have been told anything about the home he is going to and then does a "reading" of the home. Well whom ever goes on a Bigfoot expedition would NEED to know what to be looking for. I for one believe without a doubt that there are people who can pick up on the thoughts or presence of a other worldly entity. Both my fiancé and myself had a reading with a lady by the name of Mary Joe McCabe, and let me tell you, I left her office with a feeling of awe. She new things about me that KNOW ONE could know of, not even my family or Fiancé. These are the types of people I would take on an expedition, all they need to know is what they are looking for and they can "scan" the frequency's on hone in on a Bigfoot. THAT would be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I hate to say it, man, but I put no faith whatsoever in any psychic, medium, spirit guide, etc., and I have nothing for any of them. Most are fake and are really good con artists who can read people like a book, and the ones who are real, well let's just say I know how they know what they know. That being said, for reasons a few others on here will understand as well, if there is anything paranormal to BF or some entity that appears similar to a BF, I think the psychic person just might yield some results for some people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spader Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I agree, most are people that can lead a person with very subtle questions. With my experience she sat down and just started talking, she said she got her info from spirits that would be there, I don't think she received phrases, but general ideas from them, most were from relatives. She would just go on and on without me interrupting, then she would ask me what she could do for me. The things she told me when she was just talking to me were absolutely amazing, I then asked questions about how things would go for me etc. A couple of years later I re listened to the tape and was even more dumbfounded. Thing that were said back then made perfect since now. I don't know how she received her info but it was right on. Bigfoot are obviously intelligent, so a legit psychic maybe able to get a good feeling as to what thoughts maybe going through a bigfoots head, and I say that with a big grain of salt. It would be a very good project though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts