Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 It's easy to say she should have had a trail cam up...who here is gona send her one? $$$ is also a problem for some folks...along with the tech that goes with it. Plus we don't know all the details of any proof she has supplied to date to the researchers she did work with. Jumping to conclusions based on a internet story with out fact checking seems pretty rash. game cameras are dirt cheap and a piece of cake to set up.you can get them for thirty dollars.also she said that she set them up but bf's were turning them upside down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonehead74 Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 It's a moot point if sasquatch can detect their presence by IR, EM, or other emissions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) game cameras are dirt cheap and a piece of cake to set up.you can get them for thirty dollars.also she said that she set them up but bf's were turning them upside down. Game cameras are great if you want to run them off imho. I have tried to use them for years with no success, going to great lengths to conceal some high dollar models. I may as well have put out Claymore Mines and opened a casino and cleared the area of possible activity. Good luck though, if you find something that works let me know. BigTex has the best camera system I have ever seen for Sasquatch research. Ask him about it. Game cameras may possibly work for the long shot, from a distance, but in close proximity even the high end IR models do emit some energy that may be picked up. There are a few very high end models that seem to be imperceptible to ungulates and common predators. I have not given up on them completely, but I admit so far it has been disappointment. Edited October 15, 2011 by Tautriadelta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HairyGreek Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 People keep saying this T...if it's true, I don't know if people can keep arguing against the supernatural. There doesn't seem to be a logical explanation for being able to avoid every type of photographic detection. Please...someone give a scientific explanation of how this could be possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Loren,over the last year,has been arguing with most of the people in bf community. I didn't care for his statement about the people that experience alien abductions, there is something happening globally with the phenomenon, he should do a little research before throwing the abductee's under the bus.there are a greater number of abductee cases than bf sightings. I think he is being hypocritical about this. I posted a similar statement on his site and he removed it, I guess his ego is getting the better of him in his golden years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 People keep saying this T...if it's true, I don't know if people can keep arguing against the supernatural. There doesn't seem to be a logical explanation for being able to avoid every type of photographic detection. Please...someone give a scientific explanation of how this could be possible. I hope that it boils down to a sixth sense that is just beyond our comprehension, or that they may possess infallible attention to detail, instantly know when something in the environment has changed...down to the minutia.... on a level that borders precognisance and honestly "appears" to be a metaphysical aberration to many witnesses. Modern humans are torn in our perception of them the same way my Native American ancestors where torn. Some legends viewed them as people, and some describe them as an "entity" It appears not much has changed..even in the modern age. For now I am overwhelmed by the physical aspects and that tends to be where my focus stays, the metaphysical is honestly too much for me to wrap my mind around at the same time and remain unbiased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Loren,over the last year,has been arguing with most of the people in bf community. I didn't care for his statement about the people that experience alien abductions, there is something happening globally with the phenomenon, he should do a little research before throwing the abductee's under the bus.there are a greater number of abductee cases than bf sightings. I think he is being hypocritical about this. I posted a similar statement on his site and he removed it, I guess his ego is getting the better of him in his golden years. I find that very hard to believe. I'm not calling you a liar at all, as I have done zero research on alien abductions (which I admit I place zero stock in as well). I do know people experience something, but I have another explanation for it. Regardless, I would like to see some verified documented sources showing that a greater number of people have experiences they relate as alien abductions than there are people who believe they have BF sightings. It's easy to state an opinion with no actual sources to back it up. I don't mind if I am wrong about it, I'd just like to see the sources with my own eyes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest RioBravo Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Game cameras may possibly work for the long shot, from a distance... This. A THOUSAND TIMES THIS. Somebody in bigfoot country find a power line clear cut (like this: http://media.photobucket.com/image/power%20line%20cut/MeefZah/052407DayRide015.jpg) and set a camera on a tripod focusing on a hillside thousands of yards away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 I hope that it boils down to a sixth sense that is just beyond our comprehension, or that they may possess infallible attention to detail, instantly know when something in the environment has changed...down to the minutia.... on a level that borders precognisance and honestly "appears" to be a metaphysical aberration to many witnesses. Modern humans are torn in our perception of them the same way my Native American ancestors where torn. Some legends viewed them as people, and some describe them as an "entity" It appears not much has changed..even in the modern age. For now I am overwhelmed by the physical aspects and that tends to be where my focus stays, the metaphysical is honestly too much for me to wrap my mind around at the same time and remain unbiased. I have a friend who killed a nice 6.5 year old buck the first morning he hunted a new property. He was taking some kids hunting and while scouting the afternoon before, found a nice rubline. He decided to hunt it himself the next morning while the kids were in box stands with their adult partners. He placed a climbing stand well downwind and trimmed just a few limbs for a shooting land. Only one of the limbs was near the rubline. The next morning, just at daylight, he saw the buck slipping along the rubline. He knew he would have no shot at all except in the shooting lane he had made. The buck was upwind, and did not seem to sense my friend at all. The second the buck stepped into the shooting land, it immediately snapped its head and looked dead at my friend in his climbing stand, as if it knew he was there, although he had never hunted there before, no one else had, and there is no way for the buck to have known how high he would have been off the ground. That buck is an example of being a master of its environment, and being able to recognize every small change, no matter how seemingly insignificant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 Game cameras are great if you want to run them off imho. I have tried to use them for years with no success, going to great lengths to conceal some high dollar models. I may as well have put out Claymore Mines and opened a casino and cleared the area of possible activity. Good luck though, if you find something that works let me know. BigTex has the best camera system I have ever seen for Sasquatch research. Ask him about it. Game cameras may possibly work for the long shot, from a distance, but in close proximity even the high end IR models do emit some energy that may be picked up. There are a few very high end models that seem to be imperceptible to ungulates and common predators. I have not given up on them completely, but I admit so far it has been disappointment. I was replying to a comment about being affordable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 (edited) I find that very hard to believe. I'm not calling you a liar at all, as I have done zero research on alien abductions (which I admit I place zero stock in as well). I do know people experience something, but I have another explanation for it. Regardless, I would like to see some verified documented sources showing that a greater number of people have experiences they relate as alien abductions than there are people who believe they have BF sightings. It's easy to state an opinion with no actual sources to back it up. I don't mind if I am wrong about it, I'd just like to see the sources with my own eyes... Just do some searches and you will see that there are many more cases,even cases with implants. search dr.lear,he has did surgery on people and removed implants and after testing the implants the materials are not from earth,and there were other observations also Edited October 15, 2011 by zigoapex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDL Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 What might work would be to set up a game camera or two that are obvious. Set up one or two more that are not obvious and positioned to catch anything bypassing the obvious ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 What might work would be to set up a game camera or two that are obvious. Set up one or two more that are not obvious and positioned to catch anything bypassing the obvious ones. Placing game cams high in trees facing downward works well also, and as far as Mrs. Pfeifer goes, since she is feeding them in her yard supposedly, why not simply place a camera full time facing out the window or something like that? It would not be difficult to make it rather inconspicuous, especially if it was gradually introduced. Of course that might bring her story to an end... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 That is a nice story about the buck. Revealing. Humans, we too do have a sense of when someone is looking at us, especially with predatory intent, I think. How many times have you had that feeling, and looked up right over into the eyes of whoever was scoping you out? It's happened to me many times. You too I bet. In regard to getting a picture of a bigfoot, is there really any question that it's quite a trick? That game cameras don't do the job well? Tell you what, if I was a bright forest creature and a man fixed up something outdoors and walked away, I'd steer clear because, and I've said it before on here, because of the history of trapping with those steel spring traps and of poisoned baits. Man leaves something out here, watch out, it's a lethal object of some kind. Rule is no one goes near it. Now Rio Bravo is dead right. From a distance is the key. They don't detect long range observation. Promise. And a telescopic lens is the deal. I personally have video from a distance where you can see what looks like them talking. And I've said this before here, too: I'd post it if I could get it to load on my gallery. I can only get stuff loaded on threads. Maybe I should just have a gallery thread. Mods, could I do that? As for bf only contacting a lone woman....please, homies. Assuming she really had this interaction (and then blabbed about it far and wide, which is dysfunctional if you ask me, or it came out however), it doesn't mean she was the lonely only one. That others had interaction but didn't go about flogging the fact to the media I have no doubt. Cuz it's just not cool. But maybe as someone said, maybe her info got caught up in the publicity of that Russian stuff and she did not intend it to be like that. In which case, it's not her, it's them. As for bf contacting lone women, of that I am sure. Women are probably far more approachable from a bf point of view. Women don't much go around with the traps and baits, don't hunt so much, are less aggressive in general, are not a challenge to anyone's alpha male spot, are more peaceful, more intuitive, are less strong, and are less of threat all around. They are perhaps more likely to be with children, and the presence of children signals lack of belligerent intent. You don't bring the kids to a rumble. Men have a comparatively slim chance of befriending a bigfoot, boys, sorry to say, compared to a woman, a woman with children, or even a child, for that matter. For men to send a peaceful intent message, I imagine it would help to bring the kids, if you deem it safe, dress like a civiilian, act very calm, smile, move slowly, stay quiet, keep your distance,, engage in peaceful activity, such as playing with children, making music, drawing, weaving a basket, something like that. And not help to dress like a hunter, be quick, loud, armed with various devices of unknown purpose, scowl, be accompanied by other men (looks like a hunting or war party), leave devices or food behind (like a trapper or vermin killer), or approach them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cervelo Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 IMO and based on my limited experience with my game camera many types of animals know it's there. Deer, bear, cats, dogs, raccoons, and possums, ect but guess what they all get photographed! Just recently a rare leopard was caught on game cam and there's less than 50 left! But not biggie because he has so much freetime, is so smart, he has figured out what a camera does and it's purpose so he avoids it every single time or he's supernatural.......... or he doesn't exist take your pick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts