Guest Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Thanks Jodie and Bob for your replies. Your advice is sound Jodie, and thanks for the compliment. Thanks too for giving it to me twice! Here is the latest from Lindsay: http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/11/robert-lindsay-reveals-information.html He now says Ketchum’s paper was submitted for peer review in January of this year and accepted in February. He says his sources tell him the paper may not be published until May 2012 because “Ketchum is probably having problems with the peer review. Probably the reviewers are asking for a number of changes in the paper.†His sources also say Ketchum is unwilling to make the changes requested. Believe Lindsay, or not. Lindsay promises “Soon on this blog we will give the world the first release of Bigfoot nuclear DNA revelations.†Believe Lindsay, or not. He tempts us by referencing the mtDNA as “100% human, though a rather strange human.†The nuDNA, however, will prove “hominid but not human at all.†This has been ascertained by the results on the MC1R gene from three samples. According to Wikipedia, “MC1R is one of the key proteins involved in regulating mammalian skin and hair color.? Hmmmm? Believe Lindsay, or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) Thanks Jodie and Bob for your replies. Your advice is sound Jodie, and thanks for the compliment. Thanks too for giving it to me twice! No problem, yeah forum glitch where I copied and pasted, but cut off part of it, white screened, and went back to post again, sorry about that. Well I read it, and basically, you summed it up right with the caveat to consider the source. Edited November 21, 2011 by Jodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jodie Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) On the off chance that there is anything to the rumore regarding the mc1r gene, I did some reading to find out why it would be significant. Evidently all humans, regardless of race, have a distinctive human marker. Neanderthals had a slightly different polymorphism on this specific section according to other sources I read. There is genetic variation among modern humans, where Caucasians can have up to 10 varying coding genes and black Africans have 5 that code the same, but all have a distinct marker when compared to other great apes. http://www.genetics.org/content/151/4/1547.full It also seems to be related to pain control in humans and mice. http://health.howstuffworks.com/medicine/surgeries-procedures/redhead-anesthesia1.htm Edited November 21, 2011 by Jodie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slimwitless Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Well, here's Lindsay's info on the MC1R gene and nuDNA. FWIW http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/bigfoot-news-november-21-2011/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts