Guest Nalajr Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 Move on folks.....nothing to see here...keep it moving. Nalajr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 22, 2011 Share Posted December 22, 2011 (edited) If you look through it, it also says this You seem to have found a mis-linked page or search query with no matching results. Please trying your search again. If you feel that you should be staring at something a little more concrete, feel free to email the author of this site or browse the archives. hahahaha I like it By the way,this neither a yay nor nay,I simply find the statement funny Edited December 22, 2011 by JohnC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest slimwitless Posted December 26, 2011 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Bigfoot evidence blog is reporting the paper has been rejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernyahoo Posted December 26, 2011 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Looks like more third hand information from a questionable source who's been grinding an axe for Paulides. Maybe he has one of those rejected samples people have been asking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 26, 2011 Share Posted December 26, 2011 Just a quick note, Paulides has replyed with a strongly worded response in the comment section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted December 26, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted December 26, 2011 Bigfoot evidence blog is reporting the paper has been rejected. This is one case where I will side with Mr. Paulides comments on the blog rejecting Fasano's blurb wholesale. If I had to choose on credibility I'd choose Paulides statements over Fasano's any day of the week, twice on a Sunday or an after Christmas Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 26, 2011 Share Posted December 26, 2011 I posted my 2¢ on that blog. It came out a little harsh, but enough is enough with this guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 26, 2011 Share Posted December 26, 2011 It says zero comments on his blog now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 (edited) I'm not sure why so many of the other bloggers are paying attention to Fasano. He's not the most reliable source. BTW - Paulides response has been removed. Can anyone give us a synopsis of what he said? Edited December 27, 2011 by rwridley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 It's still there, RWRIDLEY. I can say without any doubt this is a complete lie and I truly question why anyone prints things like this. If you want to know the truth, go to the source, Dr. Ketchum or us (NABIGFOOTSEARCH.COM) and we will gladly answer the questions. If the study had been compromised or the data flawed, why carry on the charade, it would be over, but, this isn't the case. The people involved in the research are some of the best in the field and are ensuring that it is done accurately, this takes time and thus the reason it's never been accomplished in the past.I usually don't respond to these types of blogs, but to print something from Mr.Fasano about a topic he knows nothing about (our research) is truly questioned. I understand that this topic makes for interesting reading but journalistic etiquette means that you don't publish something unless you can verify the information from two independent sources, I wish more people adhered to this standard. I encourage all to read the standard that is needed in a scientific paper and there would be an understanding for the secrecy, length of time and effort that goes into this. Many of the fringe players in this research arena know that there time is limited once the standard is set and we know for certain the lineage of the biped and thus you are seeing some very odd and exaggerated statements. Remember, the old guard of the bigfoot world has had a death grip on the topic for 50 years and have not advanced the research, please ask yourself "why." The books they wrote, the theories they presented all were based on one hypothesis, if that theory proves to be incorrect, their research is just a history lesson.... Happy Holidays to all. David Paulides North America Bigfoot Search Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 (edited) its still there RW edit for satelite delay Edited December 27, 2011 by megatarsal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bipedalist Posted December 27, 2011 BFF Patron Share Posted December 27, 2011 edit (no longer required) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 its still there RW edit for satelite delay Oops, I was looking on the wrong blog. I was looking for it on Fasano's blog. I see it on Shawns. Thankss! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 (edited) Can you put a link up RW? I have no idea where to look.....I'm not the sharpest pencil in the box Edited December 27, 2011 by JohnC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nalajr Posted December 27, 2011 Share Posted December 27, 2011 Watch out....those NDA's will strike quickly. Is anyone sure it was Paulides that made the comment? If it was, he's right on the verge of getting cuffed, tased and stuffed for talking out of line like that. A good tasering will take care of his making any un-authorized and non-approved comments again. Nalajr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts