Bill has seen the footage, apparently he's in the documentary as well. He shared his opinion on a podcast this week but it takes over an hour of Tom Clancy like details to get to his opinion. Which was essentially he thinks that it has no legs to stand on. I don't think he is able to sperate himself from his work on the PG film to review this footage objectively. I could be wrong but it didn't come across that way in his interview. 

Hairymanroad, a YouTuber, went to SXSW to watch the second screening. Based off of his, and one other individual who went to a screening from the BF community the 40sec of 1966 film, in the words of Jeff Meldrum, "looked like a test run". Then goes on to describe how "it was "patty" but slightly different, a different guy in the suit. The lines were all the same."   It's not looking great guys. Steenberg, and small handful of others, seem to have been told the same message from Meldrum starting in April of 25. "Something big is coming in relation to the PG-film". I want to see the film too, they are shopping around for a market release but according to the director they have two more film festivals to attend before anything like that will happen. 

Same here. I could not read the entire thing since I do not do FB, but what I did read was on target in my opinion.         Unless they were at SXSW, I doubt it. Guessing at some point in the not too distant future, it will start appearing on streaming services.

A great deal of rumors, innuendo, and supposition being put forth about what people "hear, imagine, and think" what's revealed in the "new" documentary.    Has anyone personally actually viewed this documentary?   Buehler, Buehler?

I posted on another thread about this that Bill Munns opines that the new found footage was Al trying to convince himself that Roger's PGF was not itself a hoax (since Al was going to take it on tour and was worried he'd be at risk of fraud).  My head was spinning at that explanation.  If the new footage has the 'subject' doing Patty things (lifing it's foot to 90 degrees, etc), has breasts , and has a similar head (the most important), then it's pretty much done.  Why Roger would wait a year (being constantly poor) to film the cash cow makes no sense to me however.  That the film was in the possession of someone who worked at Boeing (they had a film lab) may finally explain how the PGF was developed so covertly.