Jump to content
  • BFF Registration

    Join the BFF now!

  • Who was online

      • OldMort
      • GenesRUs
      • PBeaton
      • Ljlep40
      • Incorrigible1
      • VAfooter
      • Huntster
      • norseman
      • Littlewing
      • tjcarrell
      • Fascinated
      • Silverback Sax
      • Nellie
      • Snoho
  • Latest Posts

    • norseman
      The U.S. judicial system has absolutely nothing to do with biological scientific classification. Enough evidence for what exactly?
    • Huntster
      (I did upvote you, and yes, I might be a bit touchy...........it has been a horrible winter, and I'm still waiting for spring up here in the sub-arctic)
    • Backdoc
      ( some people are touchy these days )   I mention having enough “proof of a hoax” but that’s specifically in relation to this Trial Run hyped film on this thread.  If this film somehow was Iron Clad ( and I mean iron clad) proof of a hoax then I would accept that.   I want to believe I will give the film a fair chance.   If I was honest though, I’m already very unlikely to be actually neutral about it.   I’ve predetermined this video will be a nothing burger.  I agree with you the “Patterson documentary” is the most likely explanation of this hyped film.      (I share your cynical feeling.  I imagine the planet is a better place with you). 
    • Huntster
      None. All you need is a jury(twelve people) that doesn't like the defendant or who want to go home and catch their favorite TV show the day of deliberation.     Not me anymore. In fact, for a few years now, I've come to the conclusion that there will be no "discovery" simply because IF these creatures exist, the government. MUST know, and so they must be suppressing discovery, thus there will be no discovery.
    • Huntster
      (I did not downvote you.........)   We're over half a century into this game. The Full Monte. We've seen how desperately some want to make it a hoax (although I cannot understand the desperation). That written, after all this time, analysis, and opinion, I've come to the conclusion. that the film is of a sasquatch. Of course, that's an "opinion" or a "belief", so has no scientific credibility..........but, then, I've gone on the record for years now here and elsewhere with my "opinion" that Science has lost much of its credibility................and that isn't just this silly issue. It now runs a large gamut.     There was no secret about the fact that Patterson was trying to create a Bigfoot documentary, of which today we have way, way, way, way too many available to watch. All a devoted skeptic has to do is to transform his silly documentary into a "trial run".   Sorry. I'm pretty cynical about just about everything now. I really need to die and move on. I don't belong on this planet.  
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Incorrigible1
      Incorrigible1
      5
    2. 2
      VAfooter
      VAfooter
      4
    3. 3
      norseman
      norseman
      3
    4. 4
      langfordbc
      langfordbc
      2
    5. 5
      JKH
      JKH
      2
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,510
    • Most Online
      2,678

    healthyoctopus
    Newest Member
    healthyoctopus
    Joined
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      86.8k
    • Total Posts
      990k
×
×
  • Create New...