Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. indiefoot

    indiefoot

    Sésquac

    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      2,106

  2. southernyahoo

    southernyahoo

    Passionate Member

    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      5,026

  3. Bill

    Bill

    Passionate Member

    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      4,457

  4. Incorrigible1

    Incorrigible1

    Steering Committee

    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      17,793

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/11/2012 in Posts

  1. indiefoot
    It's amusing to me how DNA evidence is accepted with very little hesitation in any number of circumstance. People going to and getting out of prison left and right. An ancient finger bone gives us a new hominin. Enter Bigfoot and the stuff is fraught with problems. No one but Todd Disotell knows anything about it.
    2 points
  2. southernyahoo
    The DNA will be what science says it is. When there is contamination,they can tell. When it's degraded,they can tell. When there is insertions,inversions and deletions, they can tell. You could have a mess to sort out, but it wouldn't publish without something conclusive.
    2 points
  3. Incorrigible1
    I agree. Great advice.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...