I was discussing OTLS!.  Not you John. I've understood what you put out there and have already expressed my opinion on it in the more appropriate venue. 
  
 I don't participate in the anti-Ketchum dogpile because I don't want to be associated with the vehemence that seems to be part of it.  I have no personal agenda so I have no interest in the non-paper issues that seem to be the focus on this discussion.  I'm not qualified to judge the paper itself so I have to read what trained experts say.  And THEN I have to take them at their word that they are who they say they are.  It's hard to do that on an internet forum.  
  
Basically- for every argument against this paper there is an argument that says otherwise and vice-versa.  There's nothing definitive anywhere and until there is, there's simply no proof just opinion.