Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/10/2015 in Posts

  1. Bigfoot Ballyhoo, eh? Seems like a detective (among others) went and did some detecting: http://squatchdetective.weebly.com/hall-of-shame---bigfoot-ballyhoo--linda-newton-perry.html Putting forth "evidence" supplied by Linda Newton Perry is akin to endorsing the tales of Todd Standing or Rick Dyer, IMHO. It may or may not be true, but the source is so tainted that anything she says is suspect.
    3 points
  2. Agreed. Accusation of hoaxing is not proof of hoaxing. So far I haven't seen enough to get me on either bandwagon. It costs nothing to give him the benefit of the doubt and watch to see what he presents next. MIB
    1 point
  3. Patently untrue. I hold it up as real. I do not accept extinction since I saw one as recently as 2013. You simply do not know what you are talking about and continue to blindly assert falsehoods. MIB
    1 point
  4. It's not that I automatically assume that everything he says is true, but I haven't seen anything that I immediately know is a lie. (Like the recent tent video. That thing jumped out & screamed "FAKE!") I usually believe that people are being honest unless they obviously aren't. Sure I can get disappointed occasionally, but life is too short to waste it being skeptical of stuff that doesn't matter. The little BF kids are always carrying toys around with them that they pick up here & there. Why couldn't the "fish eye" be an eye on one of the toys? I've heard some of them talking off in the distance & they didn't sound all that different than Mike's buddy. They might have sounded even more like him if they had been speaking an unfamiliar language. So, I'm willing to believe him until he's proven to be a hoaxer, & that hasn't happened yet.
    1 point
  5. "Find a Bigfoot. One simple task." Did that 35 years ago, Got no pics or parts to prove it, so I started looking again a year ago. I'm having a great time doing so, with good friends. When I get "proof", I'll let you know. And yourself?
    1 point
  6. Watched part of it last night. They were lucky that someone did not get bit by something venomous blundering around in the Amazon Jungle in the dark. MM wanted the guide to poke at one of the most venomous and aggressive snakes on the planet with a stick. The guide refused. Noticed that their thermal cameras were pretty much useless. Heat and humidity at night makes little contrast between warm blooded creatures and the rest of the environment. Contrast is how thermal cameras work.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...