Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/23/2015 in Posts

  1. ^^ I have to say I've learned a lot about BF since frequenting this site. And based on that the answer to the above is 'yes'. Once you sort out what the creature is about, its easy to see why. I think a lot of skeptics are frustrated because they have an (arrogant) impression that BF is just a regular animal and never even try on the idea that it may be as smart or smarter than humans. If you don't think its smart, then it makes no sense and must not exist because it does not show up on game cams and we don't find dead bodies laying around. But if its smart, (and has better night vision than we do) then avoiding game cameras is not that mysterious if you also entertain the idea that maybe it wants no contact with humans whatsoever. This starts to make sense, as all those sightings out there are the ones that screwed up and got seen. Of course I could be making all this up, the only thing is that I know they exist. But really when it comes down to it I don't blame skeptics and skoftics one bit for disabusing the idea of BF. The only response I have is: 'fine- no worries- go ahead and live your life and enjoy the woods. However, should you ever have an encounter, just be forewarned that your thinking might go out the window in one heartbeat."
    2 points
  2. Very nice write up. Data collection, details and supportive documentation. Awesome stuff.
    1 point
  3. Why constantly complain about what other people do when all you've been doing for months straight is.. complain about others? A simple search of your posts show that you've complained about scientists over 100 times in the past two months. You complained about skeptics over 100 times in the past two months. You complained about science itself over 100 times in only 1 month's time. The search function maxes out each time. Repetitious complaining, yet here you are still complaining about what others do on here. Pause, and think about that.
    1 point
  4. But on the whole, "don't make it personal" complaint. I'm sure you are a very nice person, as are all who post here. I'm sure we could have a great time swilling beer and telling war stories late into the evening. On this topic though, there is no polite way to tell you you are whack, so I don't try. Just take one area of evidence, the footprints: You are required, given your position on the matter, to say that ALL (Not most...ALL) footprints (thousands, over centuries) are fabrications and hoaxes. Either that, or you disconnect completely from reality to believe footprints are made by nothing. Either statement is complete ka-ka. You know it, but yet you and many others persist in that. That is a personal failing on your part, and I hate to have to be the one to bring the news to you, but somebody must.
    1 point
  5. This mob constantly say it's a gentle giant, that radio show that went wobbly constantly said and portrayed it as a very dangerous animal. As per usual, the truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
    1 point
  6. Most people claim they want to see evidence or proof, when they really mean they want to rub their own face in a corpse. They momentarily convince themselves that some evidence might exist that would be a suitable substitute for a corpse, then when they see that evidence, their cynical side convinces them it must be a clever hoax. It's a sad cycle. BTW.....This mystery is much older than 50 years.
    1 point
  7. You claim that you don't care who wins, but still spend your time playing 'we win' games. There is no sense in that. Also, you wouldn't recognize a joke even if they screamed "April Fools!" How about actually providing specifics of said evidence that you claim proves existence, rather than constantly giving vague canned answers and playing Bigfoot cheerleader? For all anyone knows you haven't read much of anything- like when you claimed to have read Bill Munns book but never did. Try listing some specifics. We've seen people on this forum lie and hoax. We've seen you hilariously get taken in by an April Fools joke. We've also seen you list a hoax as one of your favorite and most compelling reports. You of all people should know that humans are capable of doing this to themselves, but you just continue to keep denying it. With your history of being duped I'm surprised that believers even take your stance seriously. BTW nobody here said it's all hoaxing anyways. There are also misidentifications like the Skookum cast- which you still think is a real Sasquatch even though the evidence screams Elk, but that seems to be a common thing with you.
    1 point
  8. As to motivations, I just do not feel comfortable sharing as that info may be relatable and could point out individuals. It was nothing sinister in nature or of wrong doing. I doubt that I or any of the others will be compensated for any kind of food costs. The projects decided location is still going to remain private as it may be of value for study under another project or effort. As far as I know the falcon project is down and all members have either gone their seperate ways or a select few are developing their own research project. ( will likely elaborate on this at some point in the near future. ) It is a shame I was not really able to chat with others after the presentation as I really did want to speak with many who attended. I had to take off with Shane Corson as he had to rush to do an episode of Monster X radio.
    1 point
  9. At least try to make sense when talking your way out of something. Which evidence are you talking about? Be more specific. Evidence is constantly debated on this forum. Nobody is ignoring human behavior, which lying is a big part of. Whenever that's brought up a lot of people seem to cover their ears.
    1 point
  10. There is one Standing video that could be real IMO......he's filming from a rise over to another rise above a low area, and something black is clearly shown moving through the trees. No clear views, but it seems to be moving pretty swift & fast, and certainly faster than any human I've seen, plus for once he seems to have a truly excited tone to his voice on the film.
    1 point
  11. Why is there such a divide and such hostility between two groups of people who are actively interested in the same subject? That seems silly to me...
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...