Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Incorrigible1

    Incorrigible1

    Steering Committee


    • Points

      2

    • Posts

      18,550


  2. PBeaton

    PBeaton

    Passionate Member


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      8,756


  3. Huntster

    Huntster

    Sésquac


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      32,090


  4. Patterson-Gimlin

    Patterson-Gimlin

    Engaged Member


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      2,448


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/29/2017 in Posts

  1. Right. And failure to control via inadequate vetting likely comes with liability. When those issues have been addressed, the result looks just like every other bigfoot research group's web site and investigation "team". Rather than reinventing the wheel and starting with zero reports, it's more productive to join one of the groups and assist them. They've likely got mounds of reports needing investigating, mounds of raw data you may access as an investigator for deriving trends, and so on, plus having access to people with experience investigating and probably subject matter experts in various investigation / documentation techniques like track casting, finger printing, tracking, and so on. MIB
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...